mirror of
https://gitee.com/bianbu-linux/linux-6.6
synced 2025-04-24 14:07:52 -04:00
mptcp: pm: only decrement add_addr_accepted for MPJ req
commit 1c1f721375989579e46741f59523e39ec9b2a9bd upstream.
Adding the following warning ...
WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)
... before decrementing the add_addr_accepted counter helped to find a
bug when running the "remove single subflow" subtest from the
mptcp_join.sh selftest.
Removing a 'subflow' endpoint will first trigger a RM_ADDR, then the
subflow closure. Before this patch, and upon the reception of the
RM_ADDR, the other peer will then try to decrement this
add_addr_accepted. That's not correct because the attached subflows have
not been created upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR.
A way to solve that is to decrement the counter only if the attached
subflow was an MP_JOIN to a remote id that was not 0, and initiated by
the host receiving the RM_ADDR.
Fixes: d0876b2284
("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-9-38035d40de5b@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
43cf912b0b
commit
d20bf2c96d
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
|
|||
mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
|
||||
|
||||
removed = true;
|
||||
removed |= subflow->request_join;
|
||||
if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW)
|
||||
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -851,7 +851,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
|
|||
if (!mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
|
||||
if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR && rm_id &&
|
||||
!WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)) {
|
||||
/* Note: if the subflow has been closed before, this
|
||||
* add_addr_accepted counter will not be decremented.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue