btrfs: pass the dentry to btrfs_log_new_name() instead of the inode

In the next patch in the series, there will be the need to access the old
name, and its length, of an inode when logging the inode during a rename.
So instead of passing the inode to btrfs_log_new_name() pass the dentry,
because from the dentry we can get the inode, the name and its length.

This will avoid passing 3 new parameters to btrfs_log_new_name() in the
next patch - the name, its length and an index number. This way we end
up passing only 1 new parameter, the index number.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana 2022-01-20 11:00:07 +00:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 839061fe88
commit d5f5bd5465
3 changed files with 20 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void btrfs_record_unlink_dir(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
void btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *dir);
void btrfs_log_new_name(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct btrfs_inode *old_dir,
struct dentry *old_dentry, struct btrfs_inode *old_dir,
struct dentry *parent);
#endif