mirror of
https://gitee.com/bianbu-linux/linux-6.6
synced 2025-04-26 14:17:26 -04:00
LSM: Revive security_task_alloc() hook and per "struct task_struct" security blob.
We switched from "struct task_struct"->security to "struct cred"->security in Linux 2.6.29. But not all LSM modules were happy with that change. TOMOYO LSM module is an example which want to use per "struct task_struct" security blob, for TOMOYO's security context is defined based on "struct task_struct" rather than "struct cred". AppArmor LSM module is another example which want to use it, for AppArmor is currently abusing the cred a little bit to store the change_hat and setexeccon info. Although security_task_free() hook was revived in Linux 3.4 because Yama LSM module wanted to release per "struct task_struct" security blob, security_task_alloc() hook and "struct task_struct"->security field were not revived. Nowadays, we are getting proposals of lightweight LSM modules which want to use per "struct task_struct" security blob. We are already allowing multiple concurrent LSM modules (up to one fully armored module which uses "struct cred"->security field or exclusive hooks like security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(), plus unlimited number of lightweight modules which do not use "struct cred"->security nor exclusive hooks) as long as they are built into the kernel. But this patch does not implement variable length "struct task_struct"->security field which will become needed when multiple LSM modules want to use "struct task_struct"-> security field. Although it won't be difficult to implement variable length "struct task_struct"->security field, let's think about it after we merged this patch. Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Tested-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com> Acked-by: José Bollo <jobol@nonadev.net> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Cc: José Bollo <jobol@nonadev.net> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
840c91dc6a
commit
e4e55b47ed
6 changed files with 37 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ int security_file_send_sigiotask(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
|||
int security_file_receive(struct file *file);
|
||||
int security_file_open(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred);
|
||||
int security_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags);
|
||||
int security_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long clone_flags);
|
||||
void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task);
|
||||
int security_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp);
|
||||
void security_cred_free(struct cred *cred);
|
||||
|
@ -861,6 +862,12 @@ static inline int security_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int security_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
unsigned long clone_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
{ }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue