srcu: Remove cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()

The cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() function was added because NVME
used WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueues and SRCU did not, which meant that
NVME workqueues waiting on SRCU workqueues could result in deadlocks
during low-memory conditions.  However, SRCU now also has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
workqueues, so there is no longer a potential for deadlock.  Furthermore,
it turns out to be extremely hard to use cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
correctly due to the fact that SRCU callback invocation accesses the
srcu_struct structure's per-CPU data area just after callbacks are
invoked.  Therefore, the usual practice of using srcu_barrier() to wait
for callbacks to be invoked before invoking cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
fails because SRCU's callback-invocation workqueue handler might be
delayed, which can result in cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced() being invoked
(and thus freeing the per-CPU data) before the SRCU's callback-invocation
workqueue handler is finished using that per-CPU data.  Nor is this a
theoretical problem: KASAN emitted use-after-free warnings because of
this problem on actual runs.

In short, NVME can now safely invoke cleanup_srcu_struct(), which
avoids the use-after-free scenario.  And cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()
is quite difficult to use safely.  This commit therefore removes
cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), switching its sole user back to
cleanup_srcu_struct().  This effectively reverts the following pair
of commits:

f7194ac32c ("srcu: Add cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced()")
4317228ad9 ("nvme: Avoid flush dependency in delete controller flow")

Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paul E. McKenney 2019-02-13 13:54:37 -08:00
parent 5cdfd174ea
commit f5ad399149
5 changed files with 18 additions and 66 deletions

View file

@ -56,45 +56,11 @@ struct srcu_struct { };
void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
void _cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool quiesced);
void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
/**
* cleanup_srcu_struct - deconstruct a sleep-RCU structure
* @ssp: structure to clean up.
*
* Must invoke this after you are finished using a given srcu_struct that
* was initialized via init_srcu_struct(), else you leak memory.
*/
static inline void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
_cleanup_srcu_struct(ssp, false);
}
/**
* cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced - deconstruct a quiesced sleep-RCU structure
* @ssp: structure to clean up.
*
* Must invoke this after you are finished using a given srcu_struct that
* was initialized via init_srcu_struct(), else you leak memory. Also,
* all grace-period processing must have completed.
*
* "Completed" means that the last synchronize_srcu() and
* synchronize_srcu_expedited() calls must have returned before the call
* to cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(). It also means that the callback
* from the last call_srcu() must have been invoked before the call to
* cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(), but you can use srcu_barrier() to help
* with this last. Violating these rules will get you a WARN_ON() splat
* (with high probability, anyway), and will also cause the srcu_struct
* to be leaked.
*/
static inline void cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
_cleanup_srcu_struct(ssp, true);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/**