In order to allow the BPF program in bpftool's pid_iter.bpf.c to compile
correctly on hosts where vmlinux.h does not define
BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT (running kernel versions lower than 5.15, for
example), define and use a local copy of the enum value. This requires
LLVM 12 or newer to build the BPF program.
Fixes: cbdaf71f7e ("bpftool: Add bpf_cookie to link output")
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230707095425.168126-4-quentin@isovalent.com
When building bpftool with !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS:
skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c:47:14: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct bpf_perf_link'
perf_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_perf_link, link);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/libbpf/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:74:22: note: expanded from macro 'container_of'
((type *)(__mptr - offsetof(type, member))); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/libbpf/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:68:60: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((unsigned long)&((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER)
~~~~~~~~~~~^
skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c:44:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_perf_link'
struct bpf_perf_link *perf_link;
^
&bpf_perf_link is being defined and used only under the ifdef.
Define struct bpf_perf_link___local with the `preserve_access_index`
attribute inside the pid_iter BPF prog to allow compiling on any
configs. CO-RE will substitute it with the real struct bpf_perf_link
accesses later on.
container_of() uses offsetof(), which does the necessary CO-RE
relocation if the field is specified with `preserve_access_index` - as
is the case for struct bpf_perf_link___local.
Fixes: cbdaf71f7e ("bpftool: Add bpf_cookie to link output")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230707095425.168126-3-quentin@isovalent.com
When CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set, struct perf_event remains empty.
However, the structure is being used by bpftool indirectly via BTF.
This leads to:
skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c:49:30: error: no member named 'bpf_cookie' in 'struct perf_event'
return BPF_CORE_READ(event, bpf_cookie);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
...
skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c:49:9: error: returning 'void' from a function with incompatible result type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long')
return BPF_CORE_READ(event, bpf_cookie);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tools and samples can't use any CONFIG_ definitions, so the fields
used there should always be present.
Define struct perf_event___local with the `preserve_access_index`
attribute inside the pid_iter BPF prog to allow compiling on any
configs. CO-RE will substitute it with the real struct perf_event
accesses later on.
Fixes: cbdaf71f7e ("bpftool: Add bpf_cookie to link output")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230707095425.168126-2-quentin@isovalent.com
Commit 82e6b1eee6 ("bpf: Allow to specify user-provided bpf_cookie for
BPF perf links") introduced the concept of user specified bpf_cookie,
which could be accessed by BPF programs using bpf_get_attach_cookie().
For troubleshooting purposes it is convenient to expose bpf_cookie via
bpftool as well, so there is no need to meddle with the target BPF
program itself.
Implemented using the pid iterator BPF program to actually fetch
bpf_cookies, which allows constraining code changes only to bpftool.
$ bpftool link
1: type 7 prog 5
bpf_cookie 123
pids bootstrap(81)
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309163112.24141-1-9erthalion6@gmail.com
bpf_probe_read_kernel_str() will add a nul terminator to the dst, then
we don't care about if the dst size is big enough.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211120112738.45980-7-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A handful of samples and selftests fail to build on s390, because
after commit 0ebeea8ca8 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}()
only to archs where they work") bpf_probe_read is not available
anymore.
Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200720114806.88823-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
