This change introduces a new function, libbpf_bpf_attach_type_str, to
the public libbpf API. The function allows users to get a string
representation for a bpf_attach_type variant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523230428.3077108-8-deso@posteo.net
This change introduces a new function, libbpf_bpf_map_type_str, to the
public libbpf API. The function allows users to get a string
representation for a bpf_map_type enum variant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523230428.3077108-5-deso@posteo.net
This change introduces a new function, libbpf_bpf_prog_type_str, to the
public libbpf API. The function allows users to get a string
representation for a bpf_prog_type variant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523230428.3077108-2-deso@posteo.net
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment.
Detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220521111145.81697-71-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Add high-level API wrappers for most common and typical BPF map
operations that works directly on instances of struct bpf_map * (so
you don't have to call bpf_map__fd()) and validate key/value size
expectations.
These helpers require users to specify key (and value, where
appropriate) sizes when performing lookup/update/delete/etc. This forces
user to actually think and validate (for themselves) those. This is
a good thing as user is expected by kernel to implicitly provide correct
key/value buffer sizes and kernel will just read/write necessary amount
of data. If it so happens that user doesn't set up buffers correctly
(which bit people for per-CPU maps especially) kernel either randomly
overwrites stack data or return -EFAULT, depending on user's luck and
circumstances. These high-level APIs are meant to prevent such
unpleasant and hard to debug bugs.
This patch also adds bpf_map_delete_elem_flags() low-level API and
requires passing flags to bpf_map__delete_elem() API for consistency
across all similar APIs, even though currently kernel doesn't expect
any extra flags for BPF_MAP_DELETE_ELEM operation.
List of map operations that get these high-level APIs:
- bpf_map_lookup_elem;
- bpf_map_update_elem;
- bpf_map_delete_elem;
- bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem;
- bpf_map_get_next_key.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220512220713.2617964-1-andrii@kernel.org
Adding bpf_program__set_insns that allows to set new instructions
for a BPF program.
This is a very advanced libbpf API and users need to know what
they are doing. This should be used from prog_prepare_load_fn
callback only.
We can have changed instructions after calling prog_prepare_load_fn
callback, reloading them.
One of the users of this new API will be perf's internal BPF prologue
generation.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220510074659.2557731-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Add a cookie field to the attributes of bpf_link_create().
Add bpf_program__attach_trace_opts() to attach a cookie to a link.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220510205923.3206889-5-kuifeng@fb.com
Kernel imposes a pretty particular restriction on ringbuf map size. It
has to be a power-of-2 multiple of page size. While generally this isn't
hard for user to satisfy, sometimes it's impossible to do this
declaratively in BPF source code or just plain inconvenient to do at
runtime.
One such example might be BPF libraries that are supposed to work on
different architectures, which might not agree on what the common page
size is.
Let libbpf find the right size for user instead, if it turns out to not
satisfy kernel requirements. If user didn't set size at all, that's most
probably a mistake so don't upsize such zero size to one full page,
though. Also we need to be careful about not overflowing __u32
max_entries.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220509004148.1801791-9-andrii@kernel.org
Add bpf_map__set_autocreate() API that allows user to opt-out from
libbpf automatically creating BPF map during BPF object load.
This is a useful feature when building CO-RE-enabled BPF application
that takes advantage of some new-ish BPF map type (e.g., socket-local
storage) if kernel supports it, but otherwise uses some alternative way
(e.g., extra HASH map). In such case, being able to disable the creation
of a map that kernel doesn't support allows to successfully create and
load BPF object file with all its other maps and programs.
It's still up to user to make sure that no "live" code in any of their BPF
programs are referencing such map instance, which can be achieved by
guarding such code with CO-RE relocation check or by using .rodata
global variables.
If user fails to properly guard such code to turn it into "dead code",
libbpf will helpfully post-process BPF verifier log and will provide
more meaningful error and map name that needs to be guarded properly. As
such, instead of:
; value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&missing_map, &zero);
4: (85) call unknown#2001000000
invalid func unknown#2001000000
... user will see:
; value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&missing_map, &zero);
4: <invalid BPF map reference>
BPF map 'missing_map' is referenced but wasn't created
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220428041523.4089853-4-andrii@kernel.org
Reuse libbpf_mem_ensure() when adding a new map to the list of maps
inside bpf_object. It takes care of proper resizing and reallocating of
map array and zeroing out newly allocated memory.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220428041523.4089853-3-andrii@kernel.org
Detect CO-RE spec truncation and append "..." to make user aware that
there was supposed to be more of the spec there.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220428041523.4089853-2-andrii@kernel.org
Similar to previous patch, support target-less definitions like
SEC("fentry"), SEC("freplace"), etc. For such BTF-backed program types
it is expected that user will specify BTF target programmatically at
runtime using bpf_program__set_attach_target() *before* load phase. If
not, libbpf will report this as an error.
Aslo use SEC_ATTACH_BTF flag instead of explicitly listing a set of
types that are expected to require attach_btf_id. This was an accidental
omission during custom SEC() support refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220428185349.3799599-3-andrii@kernel.org
In a lot of cases the target of kprobe/kretprobe, tracepoint, raw
tracepoint, etc BPF program might not be known at the compilation time
and will be discovered at runtime. This was always a supported case by
libbpf, with APIs like bpf_program__attach_{kprobe,tracepoint,etc}()
accepting full target definition, regardless of what was defined in
SEC() definition in BPF source code.
Unfortunately, up till now libbpf still enforced users to specify at
least something for the fake target, e.g., SEC("kprobe/whatever"), which
is cumbersome and somewhat misleading.
This patch allows target-less SEC() definitions for basic tracing BPF
program types:
- kprobe/kretprobe;
- multi-kprobe/multi-kretprobe;
- tracepoints;
- raw tracepoints.
Such target-less SEC() definitions are meant to specify declaratively
proper BPF program type only. Attachment of them will have to be handled
programmatically using correct APIs. As such, skeleton's auto-attachment
of such BPF programs is skipped and generic bpf_program__attach() will
fail, if attempted, due to the lack of enough target information.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220428185349.3799599-2-andrii@kernel.org
Teach libbpf to post-process BPF verifier log on BPF program load
failure and detect known error patterns to provide user with more
context.
Currently there is one such common situation: an "unguarded" failed BPF
CO-RE relocation. While failing CO-RE relocation is expected, it is
expected to be property guarded in BPF code such that BPF verifier
always eliminates BPF instructions corresponding to such failed CO-RE
relos as dead code. In cases when user failed to take such precautions,
BPF verifier provides the best log it can:
123: (85) call unknown#195896080
invalid func unknown#195896080
Such incomprehensible log error is due to libbpf "poisoning" BPF
instruction that corresponds to failed CO-RE relocation by replacing it
with invalid `call 0xbad2310` instruction (195896080 == 0xbad2310 reads
"bad relo" if you squint hard enough).
Luckily, libbpf has all the necessary information to look up CO-RE
relocation that failed and provide more human-readable description of
what's going on:
5: <invalid CO-RE relocation>
failed to resolve CO-RE relocation <byte_off> [6] struct task_struct___bad.fake_field_subprog (0:2 @ offset 8)
This hopefully makes it much easier to understand what's wrong with
user's BPF program without googling magic constants.
This BPF verifier log fixup is setup to be extensible and is going to be
used for at least one other upcoming feature of libbpf in follow up patches.
Libbpf is parsing lines of BPF verifier log starting from the very end.
Currently it processes up to 10 lines of code looking for familiar
patterns. This avoids wasting lots of CPU processing huge verifier logs
(especially for log_level=2 verbosity level). Actual verification error
should normally be found in last few lines, so this should work
reliably.
If libbpf needs to expand log beyond available log_buf_size, it
truncates the end of the verifier log. Given verifier log normally ends
with something like:
processed 2 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
... truncating this on program load error isn't too bad (end user can
always increase log size, if it needs to get complete log).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-10-andrii@kernel.org
Previously, libbpf recorded CO-RE relocations with insns_idx resolved
according to finalized subprog locations (which are appended at the end
of entry BPF program) to simplify the job of light skeleton generator.
This is necessary because once subprogs' instructions are appended to
main entry BPF program all the subprog instruction indices are shifted
and that shift is different for each entry (main) BPF program, so it's
generally impossible to map final absolute insn_idx of the finalized BPF
program to their original locations inside subprograms.
This information is now going to be used not only during light skeleton
generation, but also to map absolute instruction index to subprog's
instruction and its corresponding CO-RE relocation. So start recording
these relocations always, not just when obj->gen_loader is set.
This information is going to be freed at the end of bpf_object__load()
step, as before (but this can change in the future if there will be
a need for this information post load step).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-7-andrii@kernel.org
Instead of using ELF section names as a joining key between .BTF.ext and
corresponding BPF programs, pre-build .BTF.ext section number to ELF
section index mapping during bpf_object__open() and use it later for
matching .BTF.ext information (func/line info or CO-RE relocations) to
their respective BPF programs and subprograms.
This simplifies corresponding joining logic and let's libbpf do
manipulations with BPF program's ELF sections like dropping leading '?'
character for non-autoloaded programs. Original joining logic in
bpf_object__relocate_core() (see relevant comment that's now removed)
was never elegant, so it's a good improvement regardless. But it also
avoids unnecessary internal assumptions about preserving original ELF
section name as BPF program's section name (which was broken when
SEC("?abc") support was added).
Fixes: a3820c4811 ("libbpf: Support opting out from autoloading BPF programs declaratively")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-5-andrii@kernel.org
Fix the bug in bpf_object__relocate_core() which can lead to finding
invalid matching BPF program when processing CO-RE relocation. IF
matching program is not found, last encountered program will be assumed
to be correct program and thus error detection won't detect the problem.
Fixes: 9c82a63cf3 ("libbpf: Fix CO-RE relocs against .text section")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-4-andrii@kernel.org
libbpf pretends it knows actual limit of BPF program instructions based
on UAPI headers it compiled with. There is neither any guarantee that
UAPI headers match host kernel, nor BPF verifier actually uses
BPF_MAXINSNS constant anymore. Just drop unhelpful "guess", BPF verifier
will emit actual reason for failure in its logs anyways.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220426004511.2691730-3-andrii@kernel.org
The link variable is already of type 'struct bpf_link *', casting it to
'struct bpf_link *' is redundant, drop it.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424143420.457082-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Teach bpf_link_create() to fallback to bpf_raw_tracepoint_open() on
older kernels for programs that are attachable through
BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN. This makes bpf_link_create() more unified and
convenient interface for creating bpf_link-based attachments.
With this approach end users can just use bpf_link_create() for
tp_btf/fentry/fexit/fmod_ret/lsm program attachments without needing to
care about kernel support, as libbpf will handle this transparently. On
the other hand, as newer features (like BPF cookie) are added to
LINK_CREATE interface, they will be readily usable though the same
bpf_link_create() API without any major refactoring from user's
standpoint.
bpf_program__attach_btf_id() is now using bpf_link_create() internally
as well and will take advantaged of this unified interface when BPF
cookie is added for fentry/fexit.
Doing proactive feature detection of LINK_CREATE support for
fentry/tp_btf/etc is quite involved. It requires parsing vmlinux BTF,
determining some stable and guaranteed to be in all kernels versions
target BTF type (either raw tracepoint or fentry target function),
actually attaching this program and thus potentially affecting the
performance of the host kernel briefly, etc. So instead we are taking
much simpler "lazy" approach of falling back to
bpf_raw_tracepoint_open() call only if initial LINK_CREATE command
fails. For modern kernels this will mean zero added overhead, while
older kernels will incur minimal overhead with a single fast-failing
LINK_CREATE call.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421033945.3602803-3-andrii@kernel.org
This updates usage of the following API functions within
libbpf so their newly added error return is checked:
- bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type()
- bpf_program__set_type()
Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <grantseltzer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220420161226.86803-2-grantseltzer@gmail.com
This adds an error return to the following API functions:
- bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type()
- bpf_program__set_type()
In both cases, the error occurs when the BPF object has
already been loaded when the function is called. In this
case -EBUSY is returned.
Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <grantseltzer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220420161226.86803-1-grantseltzer@gmail.com
The usdt_cookie is defined as __u64, which should not be
used as a long type because it will be cast to 32 bits
in 32-bit platforms.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220419145238.482134-2-pulehui@huawei.com
Establish SEC("?abc") naming convention (i.e., adding question mark in
front of otherwise normal section name) that allows to set corresponding
program's autoload property to false. This is effectively just
a declarative way to do bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, false).
Having a way to do this declaratively in BPF code itself is useful and
convenient for various scenarios. E.g., for testing, when BPF object
consists of multiple independent BPF programs that each needs to be
tested separately. Opting out all of them by default and then setting
autoload to true for just one of them at a time simplifies testing code
(see next patch for few conversions in BPF selftests taking advantage of
this new feature).
Another real-world use case is in libbpf-tools for cases when different
BPF programs have to be picked depending on particulars of the host
kernel due to various incompatible changes (like kernel function renames
or signature change, or to pick kprobe vs fentry depending on
corresponding kernel support for the latter). Marking all the different
BPF program candidates as non-autoloaded declaratively makes this more
obvious in BPF source code and allows simpler code in user-space code.
When BPF program marked as SEC("?abc") it is otherwise treated just like
SEC("abc") and bpf_program__section_name() reported will be "abc".
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220419002452.632125-1-andrii@kernel.org
Background:
Libbpf automatically replaces calls to BPF bpf_probe_read_{kernel,user}
[_str]() helpers with bpf_probe_read[_str](), if libbpf detects that
kernel doesn't support new APIs. Specifically, libbpf invokes the
probe_kern_probe_read_kernel function to load a small eBPF program into
the kernel in which bpf_probe_read_kernel API is invoked and lets the
kernel checks whether the new API is valid. If the loading fails, libbpf
considers the new API invalid and replaces it with the old API.
static int probe_kern_probe_read_kernel(void)
{
struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), /* r1 = r10 (fp) */
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), /* r1 += -8 */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 8), /* r2 = 8 */
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), /* r3 = 0 */
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
};
int fd, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, NULL,
"GPL", insns, insn_cnt, NULL);
return probe_fd(fd);
}
Bug:
On older kernel versions [0], the kernel checks whether the version
number provided in the bpf syscall, matches the LINUX_VERSION_CODE.
If not matched, the bpf syscall fails. eBPF However, the
probe_kern_probe_read_kernel code does not set the kernel version
number provided to the bpf syscall, which causes the loading process
alwasys fails for old versions. It means that libbpf will replace the
new API with the old one even the kernel supports the new one.
Solution:
After a discussion in [1], the solution is using BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT
program type instead of BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE because kernel does not
enfoce version check for tracepoint programs. I test the patch in old
kernels (4.18 and 4.19) and it works well.
[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19/source/kernel/bpf/syscall.c#L1360
[1] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/473
Signed-off-by: Runqing Yang <rainkin1993@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220409144928.27499-1-rainkin1993@gmail.com
During BPF static linking, all the ELF relocations and .BTF.ext
information (including CO-RE relocations) are preserved for __weak
subprograms that were logically overriden by either previous weak
subprogram instance or by corresponding "strong" (non-weak) subprogram.
This is just how native user-space linkers work, nothing new.
But libbpf is over-zealous when processing CO-RE relocation to error out
when CO-RE relocation belonging to such eliminated weak subprogram is
encountered. Instead of erroring out on this expected situation, log
debug-level message and skip the relocation.
Fixes: db2b8b0642 ("libbpf: Support CO-RE relocations for multi-prog sections")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220408181425.2287230-2-andrii@kernel.org
During BTF fix up for global variables, global variable can be global
weak and will have STB_WEAK binding in ELF. Support such global
variables in addition to non-weak ones.
This is not the problem when using BPF static linking, as BPF static
linker "fixes up" BTF during generation so that libbpf doesn't have to
do it anymore during bpf_object__open(), which led to this not being
noticed for a while, along with a pretty rare (currently) use of __weak
variables and maps.
Reported-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407230446.3980075-2-andrii@kernel.org
For uprobe auto-attach, the parsing can be simplified for the SEC()
name to a single sscanf(); the return value of the sscanf can then
be used to distinguish between sections that simply specify
"u[ret]probe" (and thus cannot auto-attach), those that specify
"u[ret]probe/binary_path:function+offset" etc.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1649245431-29956-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
In the process of doing path resolution for uprobe attach, libraries are
identified by matching a ".so" substring in the binary_path.
This matches a lot of patterns that do not conform to library.so[.version]
format, so instead match a ".so" _suffix_, and if that fails match a
".so." substring for the versioned library case.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1649245431-29956-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Wire up libbpf USDT support APIs without yet implementing all the
nitty-gritty details of USDT discovery, spec parsing, and BPF map
initialization.
User-visible user-space API is simple and is conceptually very similar
to uprobe API.
bpf_program__attach_usdt() API allows to programmatically attach given
BPF program to a USDT, specified through binary path (executable or
shared lib), USDT provider and name. Also, just like in uprobe case, PID
filter is specified (0 - self, -1 - any process, or specific PID).
Optionally, USDT cookie value can be specified. Such single API
invocation will try to discover given USDT in specified binary and will
use (potentially many) BPF uprobes to attach this program in correct
locations.
Just like any bpf_program__attach_xxx() APIs, bpf_link is returned that
represents this attachment. It is a virtual BPF link that doesn't have
direct kernel object, as it can consist of multiple underlying BPF
uprobe links. As such, attachment is not atomic operation and there can
be brief moment when some USDT call sites are attached while others are
still in the process of attaching. This should be taken into
consideration by user. But bpf_program__attach_usdt() guarantees that
in the case of success all USDT call sites are successfully attached, or
all the successfuly attachments will be detached as soon as some USDT
call sites failed to be attached. So, in theory, there could be cases of
failed bpf_program__attach_usdt() call which did trigger few USDT
program invocations. This is unavoidable due to multi-uprobe nature of
USDT and has to be handled by user, if it's important to create an
illusion of atomicity.
USDT BPF programs themselves are marked in BPF source code as either
SEC("usdt"), in which case they won't be auto-attached through
skeleton's <skel>__attach() method, or it can have a full definition,
which follows the spirit of fully-specified uprobes:
SEC("usdt/<path>:<provider>:<name>"). In the latter case skeleton's
attach method will attempt auto-attachment. Similarly, generic
bpf_program__attach() will have enought information to go off of for
parameterless attachment.
USDT BPF programs are actually uprobes, and as such for kernel they are
marked as BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE.
Another part of this patch is USDT-related feature probing:
- BPF cookie support detection from user-space;
- detection of kernel support for auto-refcounting of USDT semaphore.
The latter is optional. If kernel doesn't support such feature and USDT
doesn't rely on USDT semaphores, no error is returned. But if libbpf
detects that USDT requires setting semaphores and kernel doesn't support
this, libbpf errors out with explicit pr_warn() message. Libbpf doesn't
support poking process's memory directly to increment semaphore value,
like BCC does on legacy kernels, due to inherent raciness and danger of
such process memory manipulation. Libbpf let's kernel take care of this
properly or gives up.
Logistically, all the extra USDT-related infrastructure of libbpf is put
into a separate usdt.c file and abstracted behind struct usdt_manager.
Each bpf_object has lazily-initialized usdt_manager pointer, which is
only instantiated if USDT programs are attempted to be attached. Closing
BPF object frees up usdt_manager resources. usdt_manager keeps track of
USDT spec ID assignment and few other small things.
Subsequent patches will fill out remaining missing pieces of USDT
initialization and setup logic.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220404234202.331384-3-andrii@kernel.org
attach_probe selftest fails on Debian-based distros with `failed to
resolve full path for 'libc.so.6'`. The reason is that these distros
embraced multiarch to the point where even for the "main" architecture
they store libc in /lib/<triple>.
This is configured in /etc/ld.so.conf and in theory it's possible to
replicate the loader's parsing and processing logic in libbpf, however
a much simpler solution is to just enumerate the known library paths.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220404225020.51029-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Now that u[ret]probes can use name-based specification, it makes
sense to add support for auto-attach based on SEC() definition.
The format proposed is
SEC("u[ret]probe/binary:[raw_offset|[function_name[+offset]]")
For example, to trace malloc() in libc:
SEC("uprobe/libc.so.6:malloc")
...or to trace function foo2 in /usr/bin/foo:
SEC("uprobe//usr/bin/foo:foo2")
Auto-attach is done for all tasks (pid -1). prog can be an absolute
path or simply a program/library name; in the latter case, we use
PATH/LD_LIBRARY_PATH to resolve the full path, falling back to
standard locations (/usr/bin:/usr/sbin or /usr/lib64:/usr/lib) if
the file is not found via environment-variable specified locations.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1648654000-21758-4-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
kprobe attach is name-based, using lookups of kallsyms to translate
a function name to an address. Currently uprobe attach is done
via an offset value as described in [1]. Extend uprobe opts
for attach to include a function name which can then be converted
into a uprobe-friendly offset. The calcualation is done in
several steps:
1. First, determine the symbol address using libelf; this gives us
the offset as reported by objdump
2. If the function is a shared library function - and the binary
provided is a shared library - no further work is required;
the address found is the required address
3. Finally, if the function is local, subtract the base address
associated with the object, retrieved from ELF program headers.
The resultant value is then added to the func_offset value passed
in to specify the uprobe attach address. So specifying a func_offset
of 0 along with a function name "printf" will attach to printf entry.
The modes of operation supported are then
1. to attach to a local function in a binary; function "foo1" in
"/usr/bin/foo"
2. to attach to a shared library function in a shared library -
function "malloc" in libc.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/trace/uprobetracer.html
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1648654000-21758-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts() requires a binary_path argument
specifying binary to instrument. Supporting simply specifying
"libc.so.6" or "foo" should be possible too.
Library search checks LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then /usr/lib64, /usr/lib.
This allows users to run BPF programs prefixed with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path2/lib while still searching standard locations.
Similarly for non .so files, we check PATH and /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
Path determination will be useful for auto-attach of BPF uprobe programs
using SEC() definition.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1648654000-21758-2-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
If BPF object doesn't have an BTF info, don't attempt to search for BTF
types describing BPF map key or value layout.
Fixes: 262cfb74ff ("libbpf: Init btf_{key,value}_type_id on internal map open")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220320001911.3640917-1-andrii@kernel.org
Currently, libbpf considers a single routine in .text to be a program. This
is particularly confusing when it comes to library objects - a single routine
meant to be used as an extern will instead be considered a bpf_program.
This patch hides this compatibility behavior behind the pre-existing
SEC_NAME strict mode flag.
Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/018de8d0d67c04bf436055270d35d394ba393505.1647473511.git.delyank@fb.com
Adding bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function for attaching
kprobe program to multiple functions.
struct bpf_link *
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
const char *pattern,
const struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts *opts);
User can specify functions to attach with 'pattern' argument that
allows wildcards (*?' supported) or provide symbols or addresses
directly through opts argument. These 3 options are mutually
exclusive.
When using symbols or addresses, user can also provide cookie value
for each symbol/address that can be retrieved later in bpf program
with bpf_get_attach_cookie helper.
struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts {
size_t sz;
const char **syms;
const unsigned long *addrs;
const __u64 *cookies;
size_t cnt;
bool retprobe;
size_t :0;
};
Symbols, addresses and cookies are provided through opts object
(syms/addrs/cookies) as array pointers with specified count (cnt).
Each cookie value is paired with provided function address or symbol
with the same array index.
The program can be also attached as return probe if 'retprobe' is set.
For quick usage with NULL opts argument, like:
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(prog, "ksys_*", NULL)
the 'prog' will be attached as kprobe to 'ksys_*' functions.
Also adding new program sections for automatic attachment:
kprobe.multi/<symbol_pattern>
kretprobe.multi/<symbol_pattern>
The symbol_pattern is used as 'pattern' argument in
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220316122419.933957-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Move the kallsyms parsing in internal libbpf_kallsyms_parse
function, so it can be used from other places.
It will be used in following changes.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220316122419.933957-8-jolsa@kernel.org
Allow registering and unregistering custom handlers for BPF program.
This allows user applications and libraries to plug into libbpf's
declarative SEC() definition handling logic. This allows to offload
complex and intricate custom logic into external libraries, but still
provide a great user experience.
One such example is USDT handling library, which has a lot of code and
complexity which doesn't make sense to put into libbpf directly, but it
would be really great for users to be able to specify BPF programs with
something like SEC("usdt/<path-to-binary>:<usdt_provider>:<usdt_name>")
and have correct BPF program type set (BPF_PROGRAM_TYPE_KPROBE, as it is
uprobe) and even support BPF skeleton's auto-attach logic.
In some cases, it might be even good idea to override libbpf's default
handling, like for SEC("perf_event") programs. With custom library, it's
possible to extend logic to support specifying perf event specification
right there in SEC() definition without burdening libbpf with lots of
custom logic or extra library dependecies (e.g., libpfm4). With current
patch it's possible to override libbpf's SEC("perf_event") handling and
specify a completely custom ones.
Further, it's possible to specify a generic fallback handling for any
SEC() that doesn't match any other custom or standard libbpf handlers.
This allows to accommodate whatever legacy use cases there might be, if
necessary.
See doc comments for libbpf_register_prog_handler() and
libbpf_unregister_prog_handler() for detailed semantics.
This patch also bumps libbpf development version to v0.8 and adds new
APIs there.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220305010129.1549719-3-andrii@kernel.org
Allow some BPF program types to support auto-attach only in subste of
cases. Currently, if some BPF program type specifies attach callback, it
is assumed that during skeleton attach operation all such programs
either successfully attach or entire skeleton attachment fails. If some
program doesn't support auto-attachment from skeleton, such BPF program
types shouldn't have attach callback specified.
This is limiting for cases when, depending on how full the SEC("")
definition is, there could either be enough details to support
auto-attach or there might not be and user has to use some specific API
to provide more details at runtime.
One specific example of such desired behavior might be SEC("uprobe"). If
it's specified as just uprobe auto-attach isn't possible. But if it's
SEC("uprobe/<some_binary>:<some_func>") then there are enough details to
support auto-attach. Note that there is a somewhat subtle difference
between auto-attach behavior of BPF skeleton and using "generic"
bpf_program__attach(prog) (which uses the same attach handlers under the
cover). Skeleton allow some programs within bpf_object to not have
auto-attach implemented and doesn't treat that as an error. Instead such
BPF programs are just skipped during skeleton's (optional) attach step.
bpf_program__attach(), on the other hand, is called when user *expects*
auto-attach to work, so if specified program doesn't implement or
doesn't support auto-attach functionality, that will be treated as an
error.
Another improvement to the way libbpf is handling SEC()s would be to not
require providing dummy kernel function name for kprobe. Currently,
SEC("kprobe/whatever") is necessary even if actual kernel function is
determined by user at runtime and bpf_program__attach_kprobe() is used
to specify it. With changes in this patch, it's possible to support both
SEC("kprobe") and SEC("kprobe/<actual_kernel_function"), while only in
the latter case auto-attach will be performed. In the former one, such
kprobe will be skipped during skeleton attach operation.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220305010129.1549719-2-andrii@kernel.org
The page_cnt parameter is used to specify the number of memory pages
allocated for each per-CPU buffer, it must be non-zero and a power of 2.
Currently, the __perf_buffer__new() function attempts to validate that
the page_cnt is a power of 2 but forgets checking for the case where
page_cnt is zero, we can fix it by replacing 'page_cnt & (page_cnt - 1)'
with 'page_cnt == 0 || (page_cnt & (page_cnt - 1))'.
If so, we also don't need to add a check in perf_buffer__new_v0_6_0() to
make sure that page_cnt is non-zero and the check for zero in
perf_buffer__new_raw_v0_6_0() can also be removed.
The code will be cleaner and more readable.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220303005921.53436-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
When a BPF map of type BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY doesn't have the
max_entries parameter set, the map will be created with max_entries set
to the number of available CPUs. When we try to reuse such a pinned map,
map_is_reuse_compat will return false, as max_entries in the map
definition differs from max_entries of the existing map, causing the
following error:
libbpf: couldn't reuse pinned map at '/sys/fs/bpf/m_logging': parameter mismatch
Fix this by overwriting max_entries in the map definition. For this to
work, we need to do this in bpf_object__create_maps, before calling
bpf_object__reuse_map.
Fixes: 57a00f4164 ("libbpf: Add auto-pinning of maps when loading BPF objects")
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@linux-ipv6.be>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220225152355.315204-1-stijn@linux-ipv6.be
The check in the last return statement is unnecessary, we can just return
the ret variable.
But we can simplify the function further by returning 0 immediately if we
find the section size and -ENOENT otherwise.
Thus we can also remove the ret variable.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220223085244.3058118-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220220072750.209215-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
