mirror of
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch.git
synced 2025-06-28 09:28:55 -04:00
Upgrade to Lucene 10.2.2 (#129546)
This commit upgrades to Upgrade to Lucene 10.2.2. With the release of 10.2.2, we no longer need to workaround the Lucene bug mentioned in 128671.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a1a862aea
commit
1255a64832
18 changed files with 116 additions and 862 deletions
|
@ -61,11 +61,3 @@ org.apache.logging.log4j.message.ParameterizedMessage#<init>(java.lang.String, j
|
|||
|
||||
@defaultMessage Use WriteLoadForecaster#getForecastedWriteLoad instead
|
||||
org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.IndexMetadata#getForecastedWriteLoad()
|
||||
|
||||
# This is a temporary patch as there is a low level Lucene bug in certain scenarios
|
||||
# this should be fixed in the new Lucene release 10.3+
|
||||
org.apache.lucene.document.LongField#newExactQuery(java.lang.String, long) @ Use org.elasticsearch.lucene.document.NumericField#newExactLongQuery(java.lang.String, long) instead.
|
||||
org.apache.lucene.document.LongField#newRangeQuery(java.lang.String, long, long) @ Use org.elasticsearch.lucene.document.NumericField#newRangeLongQuery(java.lang.String, long, long) instead.
|
||||
org.apache.lucene.document.IntField#newExactQuery(java.lang.String, int) @ Use org.elasticsearch.lucene.document.NumericField#newExactIntQuery(java.lang.String, int) instead.
|
||||
org.apache.lucene.document.IntField#newRangeQuery(java.lang.String, int, int) @ Use org.elasticsearch.lucene.document.NumericField#newRangeIntQuery(java.lang.String, int, int) instead.
|
||||
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery @ use org.elasticsearch.lucene.search.XIndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery instead.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
elasticsearch = 9.1.0
|
||||
lucene = 10.2.1
|
||||
lucene = 10.2.2
|
||||
|
||||
bundled_jdk_vendor = openjdk
|
||||
bundled_jdk = 24+36@1f9ff9062db4449d8ca828c504ffae90
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue