mirror of
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch.git
synced 2025-06-28 09:28:55 -04:00
[DOCS] Typo in Search speed (#91934)
* [DOCS] Typo in Search speed The PR https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/pull/89782 introduced some broken tags to leak in the text * Fix tags * Make all headings discrete Co-authored-by: Abdon Pijpelink <abdon.pijpelink@elastic.co>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a223d933a
commit
7c5b6483a1
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ goes to the filesystem cache so that Elasticsearch can keep hot regions of the
|
|||
index in physical memory.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
tag::readahead[]
|
||||
// tag::readahead[]
|
||||
=== Avoid page cache thrashing by using modest readahead values on Linux
|
||||
|
||||
Search can cause a lot of randomized read I/O. When the underlying block
|
||||
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ as a transient setting). We recommend a value of `128KiB` for readahead.
|
|||
WARNING: `blockdev` expects values in 512 byte sectors whereas `lsblk` reports
|
||||
values in `KiB`. As an example, to temporarily set readahead to `128KiB`
|
||||
for `/dev/nvme0n1`, specify `blockdev --setra 256 /dev/nvme0n1`.
|
||||
end::readahead[]
|
||||
// end::readahead[]
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
=== Use faster hardware
|
||||
|
@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ PUT index
|
|||
}
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
tag::warm-fs-cache[]
|
||||
// tag::warm-fs-cache[]
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
=== Warm up the filesystem cache
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ depending on the file extension using the
|
|||
WARNING: Loading data into the filesystem cache eagerly on too many indices or
|
||||
too many files will make search _slower_ if the filesystem cache is not large
|
||||
enough to hold all the data. Use with caution.
|
||||
end::warm-fs-cache[]
|
||||
// end::warm-fs-cache[]
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
=== Use index sorting to speed up conjunctions
|
||||
|
@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ be able to cope with `max_failures` node failures at once at most, then the
|
|||
right number of replicas for you is
|
||||
`max(max_failures, ceil(num_nodes / num_primaries) - 1)`.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
=== Tune your queries with the Search Profiler
|
||||
|
||||
The {ref}/search-profile.html[Profile API] provides detailed information about
|
||||
|
@ -438,6 +439,7 @@ Because the Profile API itself adds significant overhead to the query,
|
|||
this information is best used to understand the relative cost of the various
|
||||
query components. It does not provide a reliable measure of actual processing time.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
[[faster-phrase-queries]]
|
||||
=== Faster phrase queries with `index_phrases`
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -446,6 +448,7 @@ indexes 2-shingles and is automatically leveraged by query parsers to run phrase
|
|||
queries that don't have a slop. If your use-case involves running lots of phrase
|
||||
queries, this can speed up queries significantly.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
[[faster-prefix-queries]]
|
||||
=== Faster prefix queries with `index_prefixes`
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ indexes prefixes of all terms and is automatically leveraged by query parsers to
|
|||
run prefix queries. If your use-case involves running lots of prefix queries,
|
||||
this can speed up queries significantly.
|
||||
|
||||
[discrete]
|
||||
[[faster-filtering-with-constant-keyword]]
|
||||
=== Use `constant_keyword` to speed up filtering
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue