Today the docs indicate that restoring a snapshot with
`include_global_state` set will merge the ingest pipelines, ILM
policies, settings etc in the snapshot with those already in the
cluster. This isn't the case, we simply replace all the things. This
commit corrects the docs.
Backport of #70908 to 7.x branch.
Prior to this commit when attempting to close a data stream a validation error is returned indicating that it is forbidden to close a write index of a data stream. The idea behind that is to ensure that a data stream always can accept writes. For the same reason deleting a write index is not allowed (the write index can only be deleted when deleting the entire data stream).
However closing an index isn't as destructive as deleting an index (an open index request makes the write index available again) and there are other cases where a data stream can't accept writes. For example when primary shards of the write index are not available. So the original reasoning for not allowing to close a write index isn't that strong.
On top of this is that this also avoids certain administrative operations from being performed. For example restoring a snapshot containing data streams that already exist in the cluster (in place restore).
Closes#70903#70861
* Update docs that closing a data stream's write index is allowed
See #70908
* iter
* iter
This PR expands the meaning of `include_global_state` for snapshots to include system indices. If `include_global_state` is `true` on creation, system indices will be included in the snapshot regardless of the contents of the `indices` field. If `include_global_state` is `true` on restoration, system indices will be restored (if included in the snapshot), regardless of the contents of the `indices` field. Index renaming is not applied to system indices, as system indices rely on their names matching certain patterns. If restored system indices are already present, they are automatically deleted prior to restoration from the snapshot to avoid conflicts.
This behavior can be overridden to an extent by including a new field in the snapshot creation or restoration call, `feature_states`, which contains an array of strings indicating the "feature" for which system indices should be snapshotted or restored. For example, this call will only restore the `watcher` and `security` system indices (in addition to `index_1`):
```
POST /_snapshot/my_repository/snapshot_2/_restore
{
"indices": "index_1",
"include_global_state": true,
"feature_states": ["watcher", "security"]
}
```
If `feature_states` is present, the system indices associated with those features will be snapshotted or restored regardless of the value of `include_global_state`. All system indices can be omitted by providing a special value of `none` (`"feature_states": ["none"]`), or included by omitting the field or explicitly providing an empty array (`"feature_states": []`), similar to the `indices` field.
The list of currently available features can be retrieved via a new "Get Snapshottable Features" API:
```
GET /_snapshottable_features
```
which returns a response of the form:
```
{
"features": [
{
"name": "tasks",
"description": "Manages task results"
},
{
"name": "kibana",
"description": "Manages Kibana configuration and reports"
}
]
}
```
Features currently map one-to-one with `SystemIndexPlugin`s, but this should be considered an implementation detail. The Get Snapshottable Features API and snapshot creation rely upon all relevant plugins being installed on the master node.
Further, the list of feature states included in a given snapshot is exposed by the Get Snapshot API, which now includes a new field, `feature_states`, which contains a list of the feature states and their associated system indices which are included in the snapshot. All system indices in feature states are also included in the `indices` array for backwards compatibility, although explicitly requesting system indices included in a feature state is deprecated. For example, an excerpt from the Get Snapshot API showing `feature_states`:
```
"feature_states": [
{
"feature_name": "tasks",
"indices": [
".tasks"
]
}
],
"indices": [
".tasks",
"test1",
"test2"
]
```
Co-authored-by: William Brafford <william.brafford@elastic.co>
In 7.x the close indices API defaults to `?wait_for_active_shards=0` but
from 8.0 it will default to respecting the index settings instead. This
commit introduces the `index-setting` value for this parameter on this
API allowing users to opt-in to the future behaviour today, and starts
to emit a deprecation warning for users that use the default.
Relates #67158
Retry of #67246 now that #67498 is merged to `master`
Closes#66419
In 7.x the close indices API defaults to `?wait_for_active_shards=0` but
from 8.0 it will default to respecting the index settings instead. This
commit introduces the `index-setting` value for this parameter on this
API allowing users to opt-in to the future behaviour today, and starts
to emit a deprecation warning for users that use the default.
Relates #67158Closes#66419
* Adding new page for restore snapshot API.
* Improving test cases, lots of edits, and streamlining content.
* Incorporating review suggestions and feedback.
* Specify `index alias` vs `alias`
* Change parameter order
* Provide clarity around regular expression
* Add link to SLM parameters
* Split sentences in example
* Adding link to master node page.
