elasticsearch/docs/reference/security/auditing/ignore-policy.asciidoc
James Rodewig 255c9a7f95
[DOCS] Move x-pack docs to docs/reference dir (#99209)
**Problem:**
For historical reasons, source files for the Elasticsearch Guide's security, watcher, and Logstash API docs are housed in the `x-pack/docs` directory. This can confuse new contributors who expect Elasticsearch Guide docs to be located in `docs/reference`. 

**Solution:**
- Move the security, watcher, and Logstash API doc source files to the `docs/reference` directory
- Update doc snippet tests to use security

Rel: https://github.com/elastic/platform-docs-team/issues/208
2023-09-12 14:53:41 -04:00

79 lines
3.9 KiB
Text

[role="xpack"]
[[audit-log-ignore-policy]]
=== Logfile audit events ignore policies
The comprehensive audit trail is necessary to ensure accountability. It offers tremendous
value during incident response and can even be required for demonstrating compliance.
The drawback of an audited system is represented by the inevitable performance penalty incurred.
In all truth, the audit trail spends _I/O ops_ that are not available anymore for the user's queries.
Sometimes the verbosity of the audit trail may become a problem that the event type restrictions,
<<audit-log-settings, defined by `include` and `exclude`>>, will not alleviate.
*Audit events ignore policies* are a finer way to tune the verbosity of the audit trail.
These policies define rules that match audit events which will be _ignored_ (read as: not printed).
Rules match on the values of attributes of audit events and complement the `include` or `exclude` method.
Imagine the corpus of audit events and the policies chopping off unwanted events.
With a sole exception, all audit events are subject to the ignore policies.
The exception are events of type `security_config_change`, which cannot be filtered out,
unless excluded altogether.
IMPORTANT: When utilizing audit events ignore policies you are acknowledging potential
accountability gaps that could render illegitimate actions undetectable.
Please take time to review these policies whenever your system architecture changes.
A policy is a named set of filter rules. Each filter rule applies to a single event attribute,
one of the `users`, `realms`, `actions`, `roles` or `indices` attributes. The filter rule defines
a list of <<regexp-syntax,Lucene regexp>>, *any* of which has to match the value of the audit
event attribute for the rule to match.
A policy matches an event if *all* the rules comprising it match the event.
An audit event is ignored, therefore not printed, if it matches *any* policy. All other
non-matching events are printed as usual.
All policies are defined under the `xpack.security.audit.logfile.events.ignore_filters`
settings namespace. For example, the following policy named _example1_ matches
events from the _kibana_system_ or _admin_user_ principals that operate over indices of the
wildcard form _app-logs*_:
[source,yaml]
----------------------------
xpack.security.audit.logfile.events.ignore_filters:
example1:
users: ["kibana_system", "admin_user"]
indices: ["app-logs*"]
----------------------------
An audit event generated by the _kibana_system_ user and operating over multiple indices
, some of which do not match the indices wildcard, will not match.
As expected, operations generated by all other users (even operating only on indices that
match the _indices_ filter) will not match this policy either.
Audit events of different types may have <<audit-event-attributes, different attributes>>.
If an event does not contain an attribute for which some policy defines filters, the
event will not match the policy.
For example, the following policy will never match `authentication_success` or
`authentication_failed` events, irrespective of the user's roles, because these
event schemas do not contain the `role` attribute:
[source,yaml]
----------------------------
xpack.security.audit.logfile.events.ignore_filters:
example2:
roles: ["admin", "ops_admin_*"]
----------------------------
Likewise, any events of users with multiple roles, some of which do not match the
regexps will not match this policy.
For completeness, although practical use cases should be sparse, a filter can match
a missing attribute of an event, using the empty string ("") or the empty list ([]).
For example, the following policy will match events that do not have the `indices`
attribute (`anonymous_access_denied`, `authentication_success` and other types) as well
as events over the _next_ index.
[source,yaml]
----------------------------
xpack.security.audit.logfile.events.ignore_filters:
example3:
indices: ["next", ""]
----------------------------