github-mirrors/kibana
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/elastic/kibana.git synced 2025-04-24 17:59:23 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[7.x] [SECURITY SOLUTION] [Detections] Add / Update e2e tests to ensure initial rule runs are successful (#68441) (#68643)

Browse source 
* adds/modifies e2e tests to ensure find_status returns succeeded after rules are created, instead of just 'going to run'

* add documentation around newly created e2e tests explaining bug and specific regression to be on the lookout for if these start failing
This commit is contained in:
Devin W. Hurley 2020-06-09 12:53:21 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
parent 396eedbbda
commit 0f0c9f3684
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 108 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

45
x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/create_rules.ts
View file

@ -6,7 +6,10 @@
import expect from '@kbn/expect';
import { DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL } from '../../../../plugins/security_solution/common/constants';
import {
DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL,
DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_STATUS_URL,
} from '../../../../plugins/security_solution/common/constants';
import { FtrProviderContext } from '../../common/ftr_provider_context';
import {
createSignalsIndex,
@ -65,6 +68,46 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext) => {
expect(bodyToCompare).to.eql(getSimpleRuleOutput());
});
/*
This test is to ensure no future regressions introduced by the following scenario
a call to updateApiKey was invalidating the api key used by the
rule while the rule was executing, or even before it executed,
on the first rule run.
this pr https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/68184
fixed this by finding the true source of a bug that required the manual
api key update, and removed the call to that function.
When the api key is updated before / while the rule is executing, the alert
executor no longer has access to a service to update the rule status
saved object in Elasticsearch. Because of this, we cannot set the rule into
a 'failure' state, so the user ends up seeing 'going to run' as that is the
last status set for the rule before it erupts in an error that cannot be
recorded inside of the executor.
This adds an e2e test for the backend to catch that in case
this pops up again elsewhere.
*/
it('should create a single rule with a rule_id and validate it ran successfully', async () => {
const simpleRule = getSimpleRule();
const { body } = await supertest
.post(DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL)
.set('kbn-xsrf', 'true')
.send(simpleRule)
.expect(200);
// wait for Task Manager to execute the rule and update status
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));
const { body: statusBody } = await supertest
.post(DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_STATUS_URL)
.set('kbn-xsrf', 'true')
.send({ ids: [body.id] })
.expect(200);
const bodyToCompare = removeServerGeneratedProperties(body);
expect(bodyToCompare).to.eql(getSimpleRuleOutput());
expect(statusBody[body.id].current_status.status).to.eql('succeeded');
});
it('should create a single rule without an input index', async () => {
const { index, ...payload } = getSimpleRule();
const { index: _index, ...expected } = getSimpleRuleOutput();

45
x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/create_rules_bulk.ts
View file

@ -6,7 +6,10 @@
import expect from '@kbn/expect';
import { DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL } from '../../../../plugins/security_solution/common/constants';
import {
DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL,
DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_STATUS_URL,
} from '../../../../plugins/security_solution/common/constants';
import { FtrProviderContext } from '../../common/ftr_provider_context';
import {
createSignalsIndex,
@ -68,6 +71,46 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
expect(bodyToCompare).to.eql(getSimpleRuleOutput());
});
/*
This test is to ensure no future regressions introduced by the following scenario
a call to updateApiKey was invalidating the api key used by the
rule while the rule was executing, or even before it executed,
on the first rule run.
this pr https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/68184
fixed this by finding the true source of a bug that required the manual
api key update, and removed the call to that function.
When the api key is updated before / while the rule is executing, the alert
executor no longer has access to a service to update the rule status
saved object in Elasticsearch. Because of this, we cannot set the rule into
a 'failure' state, so the user ends up seeing 'going to run' as that is the
last status set for the rule before it erupts in an error that cannot be
recorded inside of the executor.
This adds an e2e test for the backend to catch that in case
this pops up again elsewhere.
*/
it('should create a single rule with a rule_id and validate it ran successfully', async () => {
const simpleRule = getSimpleRule();
const { body } = await supertest
.post(`${DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL}/_bulk_create`)
.set('kbn-xsrf', 'true')
.send([simpleRule])
.expect(200);
// wait for Task Manager to execute the rule and update status
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));
const { body: statusBody } = await supertest
.post(DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_STATUS_URL)
.set('kbn-xsrf', 'true')
.send({ ids: [body[0].id] })
.expect(200);
const bodyToCompare = removeServerGeneratedProperties(body[0]);
expect(bodyToCompare).to.eql(getSimpleRuleOutput());
expect(statusBody[body[0].id].current_status.status).to.eql('succeeded');
});
it('should create a single rule without a rule_id', async () => {
const { body } = await supertest
.post(`${DETECTION_ENGINE_RULES_URL}/_bulk_create`)

21
x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/find_statuses.ts
View file

@ -42,6 +42,25 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
expect(body).to.eql({});
});
/*
This test is to ensure no future regressions introduced by the following scenario
a call to updateApiKey was invalidating the api key used by the
rule while the rule was executing, or even before it executed,
on the first rule run.
this pr https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/68184
fixed this by finding the true source of a bug that required the manual
api key update, and removed the call to that function.
When the api key is updated before / while the rule is executing, the alert
executor no longer has access to a service to update the rule status
saved object in Elasticsearch. Because of this, we cannot set the rule into
a 'failure' state, so the user ends up seeing 'going to run' as that is the
last status set for the rule before it erupts in an error that cannot be
recorded inside of the executor.
This adds an e2e test for the backend to catch that in case
this pops up again elsewhere.
*/
it('should return a single rule status when a single rule is loaded from a find status with defaults added', async () => {
// add a single rule
const { body: resBody } = await supertest
@ -61,7 +80,7 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
.expect(200);
// expected result for status should be 'going to run' or 'succeeded
expect(['succeeded', 'going to run']).to.contain(body[resBody.id].current_status.status);
expect(body[resBody.id].current_status.status).to.eql('succeeded');
});
});
};