mirror of
https://github.com/elastic/kibana.git
synced 2025-04-23 17:28:26 -04:00
Add step about merging the target branch
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a5ec6e7af
commit
4f72ae2c29
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ Remember, someone is blocked by a pull awaiting review, make it count. Be thorou
|
|||
1. **Understand the issue** that is being fixed, or the feature being added. Check the description on the pull, and check out the related issue. If you don't understand something, ask the person the submitter for clarification.
|
||||
1. **Reproduce the bug** (or the lack of feature I guess?) in the destination branch, usually `master`. The referenced issue will help you here. If you're unable to reproduce the issue, contact the issue submitter for clarification
|
||||
1. **Check out the pull** and test it. Is the issue fixed? Does it have nasty side effects? Try to create suspect inputs. If it operates on the value of a field try things like: strings (including an empty string), null, numbers, dates. Try to think of edge cases that might break the code.
|
||||
1. **Merge the target branch**. It is possible that tests or the linter have been updated in the target branch since the pull was submitted. Merging the pull could cause core to start failing.
|
||||
1. **Read the code**. Understanding the changes will help you find additional things to test. Contact the submitter if you don't understand something.
|
||||
1. **Go line-by-line**. Are there [style guide](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/STYLEGUIDE.md) violations? Strangely named variables? Magic numbers? Do the abstractions make sense to you? Are things arranged in a testable way?
|
||||
1. **Speaking of tests** Are they there? If a new function was added does it have tests? Do the tests, well, TEST anything? Do they just run the function or do they properly check the output?
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue