When enabling the entity store with a non-superuser with all required
credentials, it returns the following errors:
To fix it, we need to disable security for the saved object client.
While this change sounds scary (exclude security??) there are three
reasons I believe this is the appropriate fix:
* [It's what rules management/alerting/detections does for creating
their hidden/encrypted saved objects.
](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/platform/plugins/shared/alerting/server/rules_client_factory.ts#L140)I
view that as the canonical example for doing this kind of work.
* Even with this change, we actually still require the user to have
Saved Object Management capabilities, both in the UI (as a privilege
check) and in the init/enable routes, upstream of where we create the
saved object. You can try this out yourself, the init route will fail
without that privilege.
* We only use that particular Saved Object client in that particular
spot, not throughout the rest of our Saved Object usages.
### How to reproduce it
* On main branch
* With an empty cluster
* Generate data with doc generator
* Login with 'elastic' user and create a test role and user with
following credentials:
* cluster, all
* indices, all
* Kibana, all spaces, all
* Open an anonymous tab and login with the test user
* Enable the entity store with the test user
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Implements controls to have more visibility over the errors, especially
in the initialization phase (populate ELSER indices)
### Changes
- Added timeout to the initialization phase (20 minutes).
- Added concurrency control for initialization tasks, only the first
concurrent migration will trigger it, and the rest will await it.
- Added proper error handling for the ES bulk index operations of
integrations and prebuilt rules ELSER indices.
- Added timeout for individual agent invocations (3 minutes)
- Added `migrationsLastError` server state to store the errors (not
ideal, this should be moved to the migration index when we implement it)
for now it's fine.
- Added the `last_error` in the _/stats_ API response.
- The UI displays the `last_error` if it's defined.
### Screenshots
Onboarding error:
Rules page error:
---------
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Use search after for finding gaps
Issue: https://github.com/elastic/security-team/issues/11860
To be able process more than 10.000 gaps per rule in one update cycle we
need to implement search after loop for all gaps.
For the API I keep from and size method, as it's much for client to use.
<img width="1250" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-17 at 15 25 27"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/806b2245-8aad-4960-84f4-d2a2818a4a12"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
resolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/198944
## Summary
Currently, the redux store can become out of sync with the state in the
UI, leading to the selected dataview not being preserved in the store,
and thereby not being saved when the timeline is saved. This PR sets the
selected dataview and patterns at the point of saving to ensure that
they are set and not overriden.
For additional background, see referenced issues.
**Partially addresses: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/210358**
## Summary
### Editing of prebuilt rules with missing base versions
**When the base version** of a currently installed prebuilt rule **is missing** among the `security-rule` asset saved objects, and the user edits this rule:
- We should mark the rule as customized, only if the new rule settings are different from the current rule settings.
- For example, adding a new tag should mark the rule as customized. Then, if the user removes this tag, the rule should remain to be marked as customized. This matches the current behavior.
- However, if the user saves the rule without making any changes to it, it should keep its `is_customized` field as is. This is different from the current behavior.
### Importing of prebuilt rules with missing base versions
**When the base version** of a prebuilt rule that is being imported **is missing** among the `security-rule` asset saved objects, and the user imports this rule:
- If this rule is not installed, it should be created with `is_customized` field set to `false`.
- If this rule is already installed, it should be updated.
- Its `is_customized` field should be set to `true` if the rule from the import payload is not equal to the installed rule.
- Its `is_customized` field should be be kept unchanged (`false` or `true`) if the rule from the import payload is equal to the installed rule.
## Summary
In an effort to make SLI charts more quickly visible on the SLO overview
page, remove SLO details that do not give users valuable insight into
key metrics and add them to a new tab. Retain some of the SLO details
above the tabs like SLI value, tags, and description (see figma for the
inspiration)
https://www.figma.com/design/91R0OtRZHy5xvaE8dGStBo/SLO%2FSLI-assets?node-id=4601-59103&t=K1vI6qtXbb48XPgr-1
<img width="1474" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-28 at 4 53 05 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3fdbe766-4047-45b5-a986-3a029c09bd1f"
/>
## Release Notes
SLO overview should give users a clear, immediate picture into key
objective data. Previously, the user would have had to scroll past
static data that describes the SLO definition before seeing valuable
information about their SLIs. This static data has been moved to a
separate tab, making charts more easily accessible.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Allow slo query wild card filters when kql filter and dsl filter both
are used.
For KQL filter, allowLeadingWildcards was true by default. introduces
the ability to use wildcard filters in SLO queries when DSL filters are
also used.
### Changes Made
1. **Updated `getElasticsearchQueryOrThrow` function:**
- Added support for `dataView` parameter in the `toElasticsearchQuery`
function.
- Included additional options for `allowLeadingWildcards`.
- Enhanced error handling to differentiate between invalid KQL and KQL
queries with invalid filters.
2. **Test Coverage:**
- Added new test cases to cover scenarios with wildcard queries and
filters.
## Summary
Background: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212173
Based off of feedback on the work in the PRs listed in that issue,
additional performance improvements can be made to the cells rendered in
the alert table. The changes made in this PR involve migrating out
shared context to a provider so certain hooks (some expensive... i.e.
browserFieldsByName) aren't made for every cell in the UI, but once and
passed down to each cell accordingly.
- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
Closes#211783
Part of https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/195857
## Summary
This PR expands the logic to get the dashboard files based on the agent.
We have many different ways to ingest data so we want to add more
metrics dashboards to the APM metrics tab. The different ingest paths we
have:
Classic APM Agent --> APM Server --> ES
Vanilla OTel SDKs --> APM Server --> ES
EDOT OTel SDKs --> APM Server --> ES
Classic APM Agent --> EDOT Collector --> ES
Vanilla OTel SDKs. --> EDOT Collector --> ES
EDOT OTel SDKs --> EDOT Collector --> ES
We agreed on having a dashboard filename pattern to make showing the
correct dashboard easier described
[here](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/195857#issue-2580733648)
First, we determine if the ingest path is through APM Server or EDOT
Collector by checking the `telemtry.sdk` fields.
## TODOs / Reviewer notes
- [ ] Currently, we have a fallback to metrics charts which is valid
only if we have APM agent so this PR adds an empty state message:
"Runtime metrics are not available for this Agent / SDK type." in case
there is no dashboard for the service language. To be improved in
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/211774 and will be updated in
this PR when ready - I will still open it for review as the other logic
can be reviewed
- The dashboards are to be updated (by the agent team so not part of the
changes here)
## Testing:
- Using e2e PoC
- The available dashboard cases can be found in
[loadDashboardFile](91f169e19a/x-pack/solutions/observability/plugins/apm/public/components/app/metrics/static_dashboard/dashboards/dashboard_catalog.ts (L40))
- Cases to be checked:
- OTel native with Vanilla OTel SDKs with available dashboard (example
case file: `otel_native-otel_other-nodejs`, `...-java`, `...-dotnet`)
<img width="1903" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44d37b05-a8e7-4f14-a1de-2c631f1843bb"
/>
- APM server with Vanilla OTel SDKs service with available dashboard
(example case file: `classic_apm-otel_other-nodejs`, `...-java`,
`...-dotnet`)
- APM server with Classic APM Agent (example case file:
`classic_apm-apm-nodejs`, `...-java`)
<img width="962" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f9e96dce-55c8-467a-93f0-a09fa219597e"
/>
- OTel native with Vanilla OTel SDKs without available dashboard (empty
state case example: python service)
- APM server with Vanilla OTel SDKs service without available dashboard
(empty state)
<img width="1910" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5219cf94-5013-4874-aaea-e558cca69281"
/>
- APM server with Classic APM Agent without available dashboard (Current
metrics fallback)
<img width="1914" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/66342f49-876c-4ad5-a4d1-1414c3abac75"
/>
- ⚠️ OTel native Dashboards are still not available (at the time of
adding the description)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sergi Romeu <sergi.romeu@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Cauê Marcondes <55978943+cauemarcondes@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
# Backport
This will backport the following commits from `8.18` to `main`:
- [[SecuritySolution] Fix risk engine component template renaming
(#212853)](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212853)
<!--- Backport version: 9.6.6 -->
### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport)
<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Pablo
Machado","email":"pablo.nevesmachado@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-03-05T09:50:31Z","message":"[SecuritySolution]
Fix risk engine component template renaming (#212853)\n\n##
Summary\n\nThe previous implementation tried to rename the index
template during\n`init` and did not consider multiple spaces. to fix it,
I have:\n* Delete the previous code from `init`\n* Created a new
migration that created the new component templates and\nupdated the
index templates\n* Deleted the old component template after all spaces
migration ran\n* Add support for multiple spaces\n* I also renamed a
function inside `init` to make the code more clear\n* Added error
handling code that concatenates error messages and logs\nall of them at
the end\n\n\n### How to test it:\n\n**Scenario 1**\n\n* The usual way to
desk test this PR would be\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk Engine in 8.17\n* Create a new space in 8.17\n* Upgrade the cluster
to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Enable the risk engine in the second
space.\n\n**Scenario 2**\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk engine\n* Create a space\n* Enable another risk engine\n* Create
another space\n* Upgrade the cluster to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Check if
the migration ran in the logs\n* Check if all risk engines are installed
and the index templates and\nindex components are there.\n* Install a
new risk engine in the space where it isn't installed.\n* Restart Kibana
and make sure the migrations didn't run a second time\n\n###
Checklist\n\nReviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as
well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n\n###
Identify risks\n\n[ ] This PR needs to be tested for upgrades between
different versions\nand a diverse number of spaces and risk engines
installed\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: abhishekbhatia1710
<abhishek.bhatia@elastic.co>","sha":"b7908a4c6f91c79459f7b509bfd444ad169d6770","branchLabelMapping":{"^v8.16.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["bug","release_note:skip","v9.0.0","Team:
SecuritySolution","Feature:Entity Analytics","Team:Entity
Analytics","backport:version","v8.18.0","v9.1.0","v8.19.0"],"title":"[SecuritySolution]
Fix risk engine component template
renaming","number":212853,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212853","mergeCommit":{"message":"[SecuritySolution]
Fix risk engine component template renaming (#212853)\n\n##
Summary\n\nThe previous implementation tried to rename the index
template during\n`init` and did not consider multiple spaces. to fix it,
I have:\n* Delete the previous code from `init`\n* Created a new
migration that created the new component templates and\nupdated the
index templates\n* Deleted the old component template after all spaces
migration ran\n* Add support for multiple spaces\n* I also renamed a
function inside `init` to make the code more clear\n* Added error
handling code that concatenates error messages and logs\nall of them at
the end\n\n\n### How to test it:\n\n**Scenario 1**\n\n* The usual way to
desk test this PR would be\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk Engine in 8.17\n* Create a new space in 8.17\n* Upgrade the cluster
to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Enable the risk engine in the second
space.\n\n**Scenario 2**\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk engine\n* Create a space\n* Enable another risk engine\n* Create
another space\n* Upgrade the cluster to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Check if
the migration ran in the logs\n* Check if all risk engines are installed
and the index templates and\nindex components are there.\n* Install a
new risk engine in the space where it isn't installed.\n* Restart Kibana
and make sure the migrations didn't run a second time\n\n###
Checklist\n\nReviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as
well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n\n###
Identify risks\n\n[ ] This PR needs to be tested for upgrades between
different versions\nand a diverse number of spaces and risk engines
installed\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: abhishekbhatia1710
<abhishek.bhatia@elastic.co>","sha":"b7908a4c6f91c79459f7b509bfd444ad169d6770"}},"sourceBranch":"8.18","suggestedTargetBranches":["9.0","main","8.x"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"9.0","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"},{"branch":"8.18","label":"v8.18.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212853","number":212853,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[SecuritySolution]
Fix risk engine component template renaming (#212853)\n\n##
Summary\n\nThe previous implementation tried to rename the index
template during\n`init` and did not consider multiple spaces. to fix it,
I have:\n* Delete the previous code from `init`\n* Created a new
migration that created the new component templates and\nupdated the
index templates\n* Deleted the old component template after all spaces
migration ran\n* Add support for multiple spaces\n* I also renamed a
function inside `init` to make the code more clear\n* Added error
handling code that concatenates error messages and logs\nall of them at
the end\n\n\n### How to test it:\n\n**Scenario 1**\n\n* The usual way to
desk test this PR would be\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk Engine in 8.17\n* Create a new space in 8.17\n* Upgrade the cluster
to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Enable the risk engine in the second
space.\n\n**Scenario 2**\n* Create a cluster with 8.17\n* Enable the
risk engine\n* Create a space\n* Enable another risk engine\n* Create
another space\n* Upgrade the cluster to 8.18 (this branch)\n* Check if
the migration ran in the logs\n* Check if all risk engines are installed
and the index templates and\nindex components are there.\n* Install a
new risk engine in the space where it isn't installed.\n* Restart Kibana
and make sure the migrations didn't run a second time\n\n###
Checklist\n\nReviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as
well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n\n###
Identify risks\n\n[ ] This PR needs to be tested for upgrades between
different versions\nand a diverse number of spaces and risk engines
installed\n\n---------\n\nCo-authored-by: abhishekbhatia1710
<abhishek.bhatia@elastic.co>","sha":"b7908a4c6f91c79459f7b509bfd444ad169d6770"}},{"branch":"9.1","label":"v9.1.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"}]}]
BACKPORT-->
## Summary
###
* Fixes Bug: User with no cluster privileges should not be able to
enable the risk score
When users with no cluster privileges open the risk score page, they
don't see any errors and are able to click the install button.
This happened because we were only checking for index privileges in the
UI, but for the enablement flow we also need to check cluster
privileges. I also introduced a new parameter to the missing privileges
hook so pages that only need to check for `read` privileges can work as
before.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe162005-ee2b-497d-8744-6262e4511d2d
* Fixed Bug: The install button was enabled when all toggles were
disabled
There were too many booleans in the panel, which was confusing and led
me to introduce more bugs while trying to fix this one, so I refactored
the code to understand it before fixing it.
I also simplified the logic to display the modal. Now, it only shows
when one of the engines' status is "not_installed"
<img width="300"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a2e8fbba-ac64-4c97-9ef0-ef6fe61e60cd"
/>
### To Reproduce
1. Create a user with security privileges and index privileges but no
cluster privileges
2. Go to the risk score page and enable the toggle
### Checklist
Check the PR satisfies following conditions.
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or
EmbeddableInput type is part of the legacy embeddable system. The legacy
embeddable system is being removed and as such, the EmbeddableInput type
is being removed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
After upgrading the ES client to 9.0
(https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/208776), we noticed that the CI
fails to upload the results of the tests to the CI cluster:
```
ERROR ResponseError: media_type_header_exception
Caused by:
status_exception: Accept version must be either version 8 or 7, but found 9. Accept=application/vnd.elasticsearch+json; compatible-with=9
Root causes:
media_type_header_exception: Invalid media-type value on headers [Content-Type, Accept]
```
This PR makes sure that the CI client is still using v8.x until we
upgrade that cluster.
### Summary
This PR improves and fixes the TLS alert data handling in the Synthetics
plugin. Key updates include:
### Code changes
1. **Request Body Updates**:
- Added `agent.name`.
- Changed optional chaining to direct property access for
`ping.monitor.name`, `ping.monitor.id`, and `ping.observer.name`.
- Added `ping.agent.name`.
2. **Cert Type Adjustments**:
- Added fields: `monitorName`, `monitorId`, `monitorType`, `locationId`,
`locationName`, `@timestamp`, `hostName`.
3. **Observer Codec**:
- Ensured `name` and `geo.name` are required fields.
4. **Monitor Type and Ping Type**:
- Added `name` to `MonitorType`.
- Moved `@timestamp` to required fields in `PingType`.
7. **Message Utils**:
- Adjusted `getCertSummary` and `getTLSAlertDocument` so that we can
properly generate alert document
## Summary
Partially addresses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/210358
Adds all callouts and logic to incentivize users to upgrade their rules asap. These include:
- [x] Showing a callout on the Rule Management page
- [x] Showing a callout on the Rule Details page
- [x] Letting users open the Rule Upgrade flyout from the Rule Details page
- [x] Showing a callout on the Rule Editing page
- [x] Showing a callout in the Rule Upgrade flyout if rule has missing base version
This PR also adds related updates to the rule diff algorithms in order to facilitate an easier upgrade experience when rules have missing base versions. These include:
- [x] When the rule has a missing base version and is NOT marked as customized:
- [x] We should return all the target fields from the diff algorithm as NO_CONFLICT
- [x] When the rule has a missing base version and is marked as customized:
- [x] We should attempt to merge all non-functional mergeable fields (any field that doesn't have consequences with how the rule runs e.g. tags) and return them as `SOLVABLE_CONFLICT`.
- **NOTE**: When base versions are missing and the rule is customized, we attempt to merge all mergable, non-functional rule fields. These include all fields covered by the scalar diff array (`tags`, `references`, `new_terms_fields`, `threat_index`). We typically also consider multi-line string fields as mergeable but without three versions of the string, we are currently unable to merge the strings together, so we just return target version.
- [x] We should pick the target version for all functional mergeable fields (e.g. `index`) and non-mergeable fields and return them as `SOLVABLE_CONFLICT`.
### Screenshots
**Callout on Rule details page w/ flyout button**
---
**Upgrade flyout now accessible from rule details page**
---
**Callout on rule editing page**
---
**Dismissible callout on rule management page**
---
**Callout in rule upgrade flyout when rule has missing base version**
### Checklist
Check the PR satisfies following conditions.
Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.
- [x] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/platform/packages/shared/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
Follow-up to: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212077
This PR includes an API test that covers `get_alerts_dataset_info` and
would have caught the bug fixed in
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/212077.
It also contains the following bug fixes:
- Fix system message in `select_relevant_fields`
- Change prompt in `select_relevant_fields` so that the LLM consistently
uses the right format when responding.
PR removes `dashboard_container` and adds `dashboard_renderer` folder. I
tried to find a best fit for files but have no strong opinions about
where I put things. Please comment if you would like files in different
locations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Resolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/212972
This PR replaces the info and error log levels with debug since most of
these errors are for developers or users. Not operations.
## Summary
This is intended to be a "minimal" migration for Defend Insights to
langgraph + output chunking. Other than the increased events due to the
context increase from output chunking, the functionality is unchanged.
* migrates defend insights to langgraph
* adds output chunking / refinement
### Checklist
- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
Embeddable ViewMode is part of legacy embeddable architecture. This PR
removes Embeddable ViewMode and replaces its usage with
presentation-publishing ViewMode. presentation-publishing ViewMode is a
string literal type so an enum is no longer needed.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes [#212745](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/212745)
## Summary
Fix for the hosts total count query, which was not correctly filtering
hosts from system integration and APM
<img width="584" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/05c3b244-3a0f-425a-82db-3498c1a6dbb7"
/>
### How to test
- Connect Kibana to an edge cluster
- Navigate to Infrastructure > Hosts
- The total number of items on the table should be equal to the number
in the hosts count KPI
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a new script for loading parameterized workflow
insights into a data stream. It enables UI/UX testing without requiring
an agent installation or generating insights manually.
Arguments
```
--endpointId Required. The endpoint ID to use for generating workflow insights.
--elasticsearch Optional. The URL to Elasticsearch. Default: http://localhost:9200
--username Optional. The username to use for authentication. Default: elastic
--password Optional. The password to use for authentication. Default: changeme
--count Optional. The number of workflow insights to generate. Default: 5
--os Optional. The OS to use for generating workflow insights. Default: linux
--antivirus Optional. The antivirus to use for generating workflow insights. Default: ClamAV
--path Optional. The executable path of the AV to use for generating workflow insights. Default: /usr/bin/clamscan
```
Example usage:
* Load 5 workflow insights, using the default values - Linux, ClamAV,
/usr/bin/clamscan on the endpoint with ID
8ee2a3a4-ca2b-4884-ae20-8b17d31837b6
`node ./load_workflow_insights.js --endpointId
8ee2a3a4-ca2b-4884-ae20-8b17d31837b6`
* Load 10 workflow insights for Malwarebytes with path of C:\\Program
Files\\Malwarebytes\\Anti-Malware\\mbam.exe on Windows endpoint with ID
8ee2a3a4-ca2b-4884-ae20-8b17d31837b6
`node ./load_workflow_insights.js --endpointId
8ee2a3a4-ca2b-4884-ae20-8b17d31837b6 --count 10 --os windows --antivirus
Malwarebytes --path 'C:\\Program
Files\\Malwarebytes\\Anti-Malware\\mbam.exe'`
