## Summary
The `/packages` folder at the root of the Kibana repository used to
contain a lot of packages.
In the context of SKA, they have been gradually moved to various
locations:
* `src/platform/packages`
* `x-pack/platform/packages`
* `src/core/packages`
Currently, only `devOnly: true` packages are left in this folder. This
comprises libraries for CLI scripts as well as testing utilities.
With this PR, we are moving ~half of these packages under
`src/platform/packages/(private|shared)/`.
In particular, we are moving those packages that are being used from
platform and/or solutions.
Since they are `"devOnly": true`, this means they are ONLY used from
tests, cypress tests, storybook configs, ./scripts/ folders inside some
modules, or other non-prod-time logic. Nonetheless, they are effectively
referenced from platform and/or solutions code, hence I decided they
should be placed under `platform` folders.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
This PR adds sorting by path to the code owners generation. This
improves readability and also avoid problems where ownership entries for
nested test plugins (e.g.
`x-pack/test/alerting_api_integration/common/plugins/alerts
@elastic/response-ops`) are overridden with the empty top level test
package entry (`x-pack/test`) when it's placed further down in the code
owners file.
## Summary
Addresses https://github.com/elastic/kibana-team/issues/1175
As part of the **Sustainable Kibana Architecture** initiative, this PR
sets the foundation to start classifying plugins in isolated groups,
matching our current solutions / project types:
* It adds support for the following fields in the packages' manifests
(kibana.jsonc):
* `group?: 'search' | 'security' | 'observability' | 'platform' |
'common'`
* `visibility?: 'private' | 'shared'`
* It proposes a folder structure to automatically infer groups:
```javascript
'src/platform/plugins/shared': {
group: 'platform',
visibility: 'shared',
},
'src/platform/plugins/internal': {
group: 'platform',
visibility: 'private',
},
'x-pack/platform/plugins/shared': {
group: 'platform',
visibility: 'shared',
},
'x-pack/platform/plugins/internal': {
group: 'platform',
visibility: 'private',
},
'x-pack/solutions/observability/plugins': {
group: 'observability',
visibility: 'private',
},
'x-pack/solutions/security/plugins': {
group: 'security',
visibility: 'private',
},
'x-pack/solutions/search/plugins': {
group: 'search',
visibility: 'private',
},
```
* If a plugin is moved to one of the specific locations above, the group
and visibility in the manifest (if specified) must match those inferred
from the path.
* Plugins that are not relocated are considered: `group: 'common',
visibility: 'shared'` by default. As soon as we specify a custom
`group`, the ESLINT rules will check violations against dependencies /
dependants.
The ESLINT rules are pretty simple:
* Plugins can only depend on:
* Plugins in the same group
* OR plugins with `'shared'` visibility
* Plugins in `'observability', 'security', 'search'` groups are
mandatorily `'private'`.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
This was most likely a mistake during the migrating packages to jsonc,
`kibana-design` should be before the overrides so in PR's we would have
specific team members as reviewers. If none specified than
`kibana-design` would take over.
This is communicated with @elastic/kibana-design members.
With #149344 the codeowners has many more entries in it, and these
entries are taking precedence because in codeowner files:
https://help.github.com/articles/about-codeowners/
> Order is important; the last matching pattern takes the most
precedence.
This reverses the order of the codeowners file, placing all of the
auto-generated codeowners at the top of the file, followed by the
manually managed overrides, and finally followed by the "ultimate
priority" rules which gives design codeowners over all .scss files in
the repo.
Fixes https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/149344
This PR migrates all plugins to packages automatically. It does this
using `node scripts/lint_packages` to automatically migrate
`kibana.json` files to `kibana.jsonc` files. By doing this automatically
we can simplify many build and testing procedures to only support
packages, and not both "packages" and "synthetic packages" (basically
pointers to plugins).
The majority of changes are in operations related code, so we'll be
having operations review this before marking it ready for review. The
vast majority of the code owners are simply pinged because we deleted
all `kibana.json` files and replaced them with `kibana.jsonc` files, so
we plan on leaving the PR ready-for-review for about 24 hours before
merging (after feature freeze), assuming we don't have any blockers
(especially from @elastic/kibana-core since there are a few core
specific changes, though the majority were handled in #149370).
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR implements a linter like the TS Project linter, except for
packages in the repo. It does this by extracting the reusable bits from
the TS Project linter and reusing them for the project linter. The only
rule that exists for packages right now is that the "name" in the
package.json file matches the "id" in Kibana.jsonc. The goal is to use a
rule to migrate kibana.json files on the future.
Additionally, a new rule for validating the indentation of tsconfig.json
files was added.
Validating and fixing violations is what has triggered review by so many
teams, but we plan to treat those review requests as notifications of
the changes and not as blockers for merging.
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Dearest Reviewers 👋
I've been working on this branch with @mistic and @tylersmalley and
we're really confident in these changes. Additionally, this changes code
in nearly every package in the repo so we don't plan to wait for reviews
to get in before merging this. If you'd like to have a concern
addressed, please feel free to leave a review, but assuming that nobody
raises a blocker in the next 24 hours we plan to merge this EOD pacific
tomorrow, 12/22.
We'll be paying close attention to any issues this causes after merging
and work on getting those fixed ASAP. 🚀
---
The operations team is not confident that we'll have the time to achieve
what we originally set out to accomplish by moving to Bazel with the
time and resources we have available. We have also bought ourselves some
headroom with improvements to babel-register, optimizer caching, and
typescript project structure.
In order to make sure we deliver packages as quickly as possible (many
teams really want them), with a usable and familiar developer
experience, this PR removes Bazel for building packages in favor of
using the same JIT transpilation we use for plugins.
Additionally, packages now use `kbn_references` (again, just copying the
dx from plugins to packages).
Because of the complex relationships between packages/plugins and in
order to prepare ourselves for automatic dependency detection tools we
plan to use in the future, this PR also introduces a "TS Project Linter"
which will validate that every tsconfig.json file meets a few
requirements:
1. the chain of base config files extended by each config includes
`tsconfig.base.json` and not `tsconfig.json`
1. the `include` config is used, and not `files`
2. the `exclude` config includes `target/**/*`
3. the `outDir` compiler option is specified as `target/types`
1. none of these compiler options are specified: `declaration`,
`declarationMap`, `emitDeclarationOnly`, `skipLibCheck`, `target`,
`paths`
4. all references to other packages/plugins use their pkg id, ie:
```js
// valid
{
"kbn_references": ["@kbn/core"]
}
// not valid
{
"kbn_references": [{ "path": "../../../src/core/tsconfig.json" }]
}
```
5. only packages/plugins which are imported somewhere in the ts code are
listed in `kbn_references`
This linter is not only validating all of the tsconfig.json files, but
it also will fix these config files to deal with just about any
violation that can be produced. Just run `node scripts/ts_project_linter
--fix` locally to apply these fixes, or let CI take care of
automatically fixing things and pushing the changes to your PR.
> **Example:** [`64e93e5`
(#146212)](64e93e5806)
When I merged main into my PR it included a change which removed the
`@kbn/core-injected-metadata-browser` package. After resolving the
conflicts I missed a few tsconfig files which included references to the
now removed package. The TS Project Linter identified that these
references were removed from the code and pushed a change to the PR to
remove them from the tsconfig.json files.
## No bazel? Does that mean no packages??
Nope! We're still doing packages but we're pretty sure now that we won't
be using Bazel to accomplish the 'distributed caching' and 'change-based
tasks' portions of the packages project.
This PR actually makes packages much easier to work with and will be
followed up with the bundling benefits described by the original
packages RFC. Then we'll work on documentation and advocacy for using
packages for any and all new code.
We're pretty confident that implementing distributed caching and
change-based tasks will be necessary in the future, but because of
recent improvements in the repo we think we can live without them for
**at least** a year.
## Wait, there are still BUILD.bazel files in the repo
Yes, there are still three webpack bundles which are built by Bazel: the
`@kbn/ui-shared-deps-npm` DLL, `@kbn/ui-shared-deps-src` externals, and
the `@kbn/monaco` workers. These three webpack bundles are still created
during bootstrap and remotely cached using bazel. The next phase of this
project is to figure out how to get the package bundling features
described in the RFC with the current optimizer, and we expect these
bundles to go away then. Until then any package that is used in those
three bundles still needs to have a BUILD.bazel file so that they can be
referenced by the remaining webpack builds.
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
* [packages] add kibana.jsonc files
* auto-migrate to kibana.jsonc
* support interactive pkg id selection too
* remove old codeowners entry
* skip codeowners generation when .github/CODEOWNERS doesn't exist
* fall back to format validation if user is offline
* update question style
* [CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/eslint --no-cache --fix'
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
* refact(NA): apply root_input_dir=src to each already created pkg
* refact(NA): update package generator
* fix(NA): correctly use rootDir
* fix(NA): use root input dir on latest introduced pkgs for jsts_transpiler macro
* chore(NA): merge with main
Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
* [type-summarizer] reimplement for broader support
* Enable sourceMaps in all packages
* include naming collision in summarizePackage test
* fix readmes
* remove unnecessary transient dependency
* remove code that was commented out
* remove outdated todo comment
* ensure errors triggered by untyped-exports are ligible
* remove unused import
* break out snippet generation from AstIndexer
* refactor several massive files into smaller pieces and add more inline docs
* fix typos
* update jest snapshots
* add sections to readme that points people to the useful parts of the source code along with a high-level overview of how the type-summarizer works
* remove --dump flag, it doesn't work
* use decName instead of calling names.get a second time
* include `export` as invalid name
