## Summary
This PR assigns owners for dependencies that are not yet claimed. These
assignments were a "best effort", and will likely need tweaking once
downstream teams start receiving renovate PRs.
Follow up to https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/205285
This uses renovate instead of backport tooling on a few more of
operation's groups. These were selected because they have not required
any code changes to date.
FTR dependencies needs to be kept up to date across all branches, but
using the backport automation ends up requiring manual intervention due
to merge conflicts.
This configures renovate to open separate pull requests per branch for
the `ftr` group. If this works as expected I'll do another pass and see
if there's other groups that this makes sense for.
## Summary
Speaking to @azasypkin, we noticed that we are not backporting many of
our dependency updates. These were mostly set to `backport:skip` before
the 9 vs. 8.x branch split. But we need it at the moment.
We'll need to revisit our backport strategy once we release 9.0.
### Identify risks
- [ ] Some deps like `@elastic/elasticsearch` might be bumped to 9.0 and
shouldn't be backported. We'll update the renovate file when that
occurs.
## Summary
This updates our `renovate.json` configuration to mark the Kibana
Operations team as owners of their set of dependencies.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jeramy Soucy <jeramy.soucy@elastic.co>
## Summary
Since the new Kibana test framework has a strong dependency on
`@playwright/test`, moving it under appex-qa ownership
I had to update and explicitly specify types when extending the
pre-existing fixtures as there was a bug fix enforcing it
https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/pull/32066
## Summary
@markov00 opened PR to
[migrate](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/201105) from `faker`,
but it probably will take extra time and to keep track let's move its
ownership to `team:kibana-visualizations`
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco Vettorello <vettorello.marco@gmail.com>
## Summary
According to `Kibana Dependency ownership report` majority of React
dependencies are owned by `elastic/appex-sharedux` team.
We had a chat and agreed that it makes sense to change ownership for
React testing libraries like `enzyme` to `elastic/appex-sharedux` for
consistency (testing dependencies are usually updated together with
React ones)
Ownership report was updated.
## Summary
This updates our `renovate.json` configuration to mark the Shared UX
team as owners of their set of dependencies. I made an attempt to group
the dependencies into logical groups, but this is easily changed if
desired.
## Summary
This updates our `renovate.json` configuration to mark the AI Infra team
as owners of their set of dependencies.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Assigns ownership of new dev dep `@mswjs/http-middleware` to cloud
security team (`kibana-cloud-security-posture`).
Dependency was addded in https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/187219
## Summary
The legacy `@elastic/kibana-gis` team is now a part of
`@elastic/kibana-presentation`. So we should move ownership of all code
to the correct team.
## Summary
Upgrades `@testing-library/user-event` to `^14.5.2`. See the release
notes for `v14` for breaking changes:
https://github.com/testing-library/user-event/releases/tag/v14.0.0
I was facing an
[issue](https://github.com/testing-library/user-event/issues/662) with
`v13.5.0` with `userEvent.click()` in a PR
(https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/189729) and was able to verify
that `v14.4.3` onwards fixes it so I decided to update that package.
What a rabbit hole 😅 !
- In `user-event` `v14` events return a promise, so this PR updates
usage of the likes of `userEvent.click` with `await userEvent.click`.
Regex to search for `userEvent` calls that miss `await` except `.setup`:
`(?<!await\s)userEvent\.(?!setup\b)`
- The way to handle pointer events needed changing from `, undefined, {
skipPointerEventsCheck: true });` to `, { pointerEventsCheck: 0 });`.
- I tried a bit to do the refactor with codemods, but there were quite
some edge cases so it ended up being done manually.
- I looked into all failing tests and tried my best to update them, but
for some of them I lacked the context to make them work again. If you're
a code owner and find a skipped test in this PR please give it a try to
fix and push in this PR or let me know if it's fine for you to fix in
follow ups.
List of files where I had to skip tests (`git diff main...HEAD
-G'\.skip' --name-only`):
### `packages/kbn-dom-drag-drop`
- `packages/kbn-dom-drag-drop/src/droppable.test.tsx`
### `x-pack/plugins/cases`
- `x-pack/plugins/cases/public/components/templates/form.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/cases/public/components/user_actions/user_actions_list.test.tsx`
### `x-pack/plugins/cloud_security_posture`
-
`x-pack/plugins/cloud_security_posture/public/components/fleet_extensions/policy_template_form.test.tsx`
### `x-pack/plugins/lens`
-
`x-pack/plugins/lens/public/datasources/form_based/dimension_panel/format_selector.test.tsx`
### `x-pack/plugins/observability_solution`
-
`x-pack/plugins/observability_solution/synthetics/public/apps/synthetics/components/monitor_add_edit/fields/request_body_field.test.tsx`
### `x-pack/plugins/security_solution`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/console/components/command_input/integration_tests/command_input.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/endpoint_responder/command_render_components/integration_tests/kill_process_action.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/endpoint_responder/command_render_components/integration_tests/release_action.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/endpoint_responder/command_render_components/integration_tests/status_action.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/endpoint_responder/command_render_components/integration_tests/upload_action.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/components/endpoint_response_actions_list/integration_tests/response_actions_log.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/pages/event_filters/view/components/event_filters_flyout.test.tsx`
-
`x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/management/pages/response_actions/view/response_actions_list_page.test.tsx`
----
I plan to do a talk on Kibana Demo Days to walk through some of the
breaking changes and learnings.
### Checklist
- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] [Flaky Test
Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was
used on any tests changed
- [x] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
## Summary
This PR fixes the team label used by the Renovate PRs for the MSW
package.
It also sets the `minimumReleaseAge` to 7 days for better
maintainability.
## UPDATE
It has been removed the execution of the playwright tests on buildkite,
the execution will be re-enabled as soon as we are ready and as
described below in the PR, there are still steps pending to be done.
## Motivation
**Cypress is not performing well lately.**
* We have been facing significant performance issues with Cypress. For
instance, it takes a long time to open the visual interface and start
executing tests.
**Teams are finding it increasingly challenging to write new tests and
debug existing ones.**
* The time and effort required to create new tests or troubleshoot
existing ones have become burdensome.
**Concern about the impact this could have on our testing practices.**
* Lose motivation to write tests or, worse, skip writing crucial tests.
## Why Playwright?
* Compared to Cypress, Playwright seems to be known for its faster
execution times and lower resource consumption. What could have a
positive impact by having faster feedback during development and
execution of new tests as well as more efficient use of CI resources.
* Provides powerful debugging tools which can make easier to write,
debug and execute tests.
* Seems to provide the same capabilities we currently use in our Cypress
tests.
* Given Playwright's active development and backing by Microsoft, it is
likely to continue evolving rapidly, making it a safe long-term choice.
Considering all the above, Playwright seems to be a strong candidate to
replace Cypress and address all the issues we are facing lately
regarding UI test automation.
## Objective of this POC
To write in Playwright a couple of tests we currently have on Cypress to
check the performance of the tool as well as the development experience.
The tests selected have been:
-
[enable_risk_score_redirect.cy.ts](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/cypress/e2e/entity_analytics/dashboards/enable_risk_score_redirect.cy.ts)
- Owned by Entity Analytics team and selected by its simplicity since it
does not need any special setup to be executed and is short.
-
[manual_rule_run.cy.ts](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/cypress/e2e/detection_response/detection_engine/rule_gaps/manual_rule_run.cy.ts)
- Owned by Detection Engine team and selected because is short and adds
a bit more of complexity due to it needs of clean-up and setting up
initial data through the API.
## How to execute the tests
### Visual mode
- Navigate to: `x-pack/test/security_solution_playwright`
- Execute: `yarn open:ess` for ESS environment or `yarn open:serverless`
for serverless environment.
### Headless mode
- Navigate to: `x-pack/test/security_solution_playwright`
- Execute: `yarn run:ess` for ESS environment or `yarn run:serverless`
for serverless environment.
### From VScode
- Install `Playwright Test for VScode` extension by Microsoft
- Navigate to: `x-pack/test/security_solution_playwright`
- Execute: `yarn open:ess` for ESS environment or `yarn open:serverless`
for serverless environment.
- Open your IDE
- Click on the `Testing` icon
- On the `Test Explorer` click on the three dots to select the profile
you are going to execute `ess` or `serverless`
- Click on the test you want to execute or navigate to the spec file of
the test and execute it from the same spec.
## My experience
- Tests are way easier to implement than with Cypress.
- Playwright does not rely on chainable commands. Chainable commands on
Cypress can lead to confusing code.
- Without chainable commands, the flow of the tests is more explicit and
easier to understand.
- You can notice that the tool has been designed with Typescript in
mind.
- Is super easy to implement the Page Object Model pattern (POM).
- With POM the test code is clean and focused on "what" rather than
"how".
- Love the fact that you can execute the tests from the same IDE without
having to switch windows during test development.
- The visual mode execution gives you lots of information out of the
box.
## The scope of this PR
- Sets the initial infrastructure to write and execute tests with
Playwright.
- Has examples and set a basis about how to write tests using the POM.
- Allows the execution of the tests in ESS and serverless (just
stateless environment).
- Integrates the execution of the tests with buildkite.
## Pending to be done/investigate
- Proper readme
- How to split tests and PO between the different teams
- Good reports on CI
- Upload screenshots on CI
- Flaky test suite runner
- Complete the labeling
- Execution of the tests on MKI environments
## FAQ
**Can I start adding tests to playwright?**
Currently, you can explore and experiment with Playwright, but there is
still work pending to be done to make the tool officially usable.
**Why security engineering productivity is the owner of the playwright
folder?**
This is something temporary to make sure that good practices are
followed.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: dkirchan <diamantis.kirchantzoglou@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Aleh Zasypkin <aleh.zasypkin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon <jon@budzenski.me>
