## Summary
**Reviewers: Please test the code paths affected by this PR. See the
"Risks" section below.**
Part of work for enabling "high contrast mode" in Kibana. See
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/176219.
**Background:**
Kibana will soon have a user profile setting to allow users to enable
"high contrast mode." This setting will activate a flag with
`<EuiProvider>` that causes EUI components to render with higher
contrast visual elements. Consumer plugins and packages need to be
updated selected places where `<EuiProvider>` is wrapped, to pass the
`UserProfileService` service dependency from the CoreStart contract.
**NOTE:** **EUI currently does not yet support the high-contrast mode
flag**, but support for that is expected to come in around 2 weeks.
These first PRs are simply preparing the code by wiring up the
`UserProvideService`.
### Checklist
Check the PR satisfies following conditions.
Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.
- [X] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [X] The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,
and the correct `release_note:*` label is applied per the
[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
### Risks
Does this PR introduce any risks? For example, consider risks like hard
to test bugs, performance regression, potential of data loss.
Describe the risk, its severity, and mitigation for each identified
risk. Invite stakeholders and evaluate how to proceed before merging.
- [ ] [medium/high] The implementor of this change did not manually test
the affected code paths and relied on type-checking and functional tests
to drive the changes. Code owners for this PR need to manually test the
affected code paths.
- [ ] [medium] The `UserProfileService` dependency comes from the
CoreStart contract. If acquiring the service causes synchronous code to
become asynchronous, check for race conditions or errors in rendering
React components. Code owners for this PR need to manually test the
affected code paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Fixes needed for getting CI to pass when EUI throws an error if
attempting to render a component without the EuiProvider in the render
tree.
## Detailed description
In https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/180819, I will deliver a
change that will cause EUI components to throw an error if the
EuiProvider context is missing. This PR comes in as part of the final
work to get all functional tests passing in an environment where EUI
will throw the error. The tied to the ["Fix 'dark mode' inconsistencies
in Kibana" Epic](https://github.com/elastic/kibana-team/issues/805) has
so far been in preparation for this.
**Reviewers: Please interact with critical paths through the UI
components touched in this PR, ESPECIALLY in terms of testing dark mode
and i18n.**
<img width="1107" alt="image"
src="c0d2ce08-ac35-45a7-8192-0b2256fceb0e">
### Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.
- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive
layout. (You can test this [in your
browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server))
- [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/157203
Closes https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/158051
Closes https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/158049
With the addition of Per User Dark Mode, components can no longer rely
on `uiSettings` as the source of truth for theme.
CodeEditor fields used to call `uiSettings` to determine if Dark Mode
was enabled, which had been provided in each callers Kibana React
Context.
The new source of truth for theme is the `CoreStart >
ThemeServiceStart`.
Currently, not all callers of CodeEditor provide the `theme` service in
their Kibana Context in a similar way and some callers don't provide it
at all.
This PR updates CodeEditor to get theme values from the Kibana Context
using a new `useKibanaTheme` react hook.
It also attempts audit the callers of CodeEditor to see if their Kibana
Context contains the theme service at the top level (Where I could add
theme to a caller's Context without major changes, I did. Some cases
will require CodeOwner guidance).
The new `useKibanaTheme` react hook will throw a TypeError if theme
isn't found in the top level of the Kibana Context, this will help with
testing as the component will not render. I will remove this after
testing so as not to introduce breaking changes.
## Testing
Please review files for which you are CODEOWNER.
I've attempted to tag all usages of `CodeEditor`/`CodeEditorFIeld` with
a TODO comment with one of the following scenarios:
1) a note where theme was provided already/where I made changes to
provide it in the appropriate context
2) I've asked for CODEOWNER guidance
For scenario 1, please pull and test that CodeEditor locally:
1. Enable Dark Mode from Edit User Profiles by clicking on the Profile
Icon on the top right, and updating your profile.
2. Navigate to the CodeEditors in the plugins you own. If they render
and display in Dark Mode - add a green check to the table below - and
you're done!
3. If it is not rendering, please help me figure out where the theme
service should be provided in the context.
For scenario 2, we will need to figure out where to make changes so your
context is providing theme. Some of the more complex usages may need to
addressed in separate issues.
## Tracking
| Team | Plugin | Theme in Context ? | Verified Working |
| - | - | - | - |
| apm-ui | apm | APM Storybook broken | ? |
| kibana-presentation | presentation_util | Yes. | Yes |
| response-ops | trigger_actions_ui | Yes | Yes |
| response-ops | stack_alerts | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-security | security | Yes | Yes |
| security-defend-workflows | osquery | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-app-services | examples/expression_explorer | Yes | Yes |
| ml-ui | transform | Yes | Yes |
| ml-ui | ml | Yes | Yes |
| uptime | synthetics | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-gis | maps | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-gis | file_upload | Yes | Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | watcher | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | snapshot_restore | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | runtime_fields | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | painless_lab | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | ingest_pipelines | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | index_management | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | grokdebugger | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| platform-deployment-management | es_ui_shared | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| fleet | fleet | Yes | Yes |
| enterprise-search-frontend | enterprise_search | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| kibana-cloud-security-posture | cloud-security-posture | Yes | yes |
| sec-cloudnative-integrations | cloud_defend | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations/kibana-data-discovery | data | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations | examples/testing_embedded_lens | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations | vis_types | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations | vis_default_editor | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations | unified_search | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizations | packages/kbn-text-based-editor | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-visualizatons | lens | Yes | Yes|
| kibana-core | saved_objects_management | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-presentation | inspector | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-presentation | canvas | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-data-discovery | discover | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-data-discovery | data_view_management | Yes | Yes |
| kibana-data-discovery | data_view_field_editor | Yes | Yes |
| appex-sharedux | advanced_settings | Yes | Yes |
| enterprise-search-frontend | serverless_search | Yes | [AG] Yes |
| - | - | - | - |
## Unit tests
Currently, many tests are failing since they are probably not providing
`theme` in the context. Once CODEOWNERs have weighed in on CodeEditors
usages that require discussion, I will update the accompanying tests.
## Release note
- Fixes theming of CodeEditors
---------
Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alison Goryachev <alisonmllr20@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dima Arnautov <dmitrii.arnautov@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Dima Arnautov <arnautov.dima@gmail.com>
* eui to v41.0.0
* update eui i18n tokens
* sass tokens
* EuiLoadingKibana
* EuiCodeEditor
* subdued
* betaBadgeProps
* EuiCodeEditor null-loader
* src secondary -> success
* [enterprise_search] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [apm] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [canvas] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [cases] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [cross_cluster_replication] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [data_enhanced] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [data_visualizer] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [fleet] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [index_management] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [infra] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [ingest_pipelines] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [maps] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [ml] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [monitoring] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [observability] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
NB: conditional became `type === 'success' ? 'success' : type` after find&replace, which felt fairly redundant, so I simplified it
* [osquery] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [painless_lab] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [remote_clusters] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [rollup] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [security] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [security_solution] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
NB: several conditional became `type === 'success' ? 'success' : type` after find&replace, which felt fairly redundant, so I simplified them
* [snapshot_restore] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [spaces] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [transform] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [triggers_actions_ui] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [uptime] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [watcher] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [infra] replace ambiguous 'secondary' color
- GaugesSectionVis doesn't appear to use the color property but it's required by the SeriesOverrides types, so changing it just in case
* [examples] Deprecate 'secondary' color prop
* [uptime] deprecate 'subdued' prop on EuiButtonIcon
* revert EuiKeyPadMenuItem betaBadge props
* mobileOptions
* examples/ updates
* fix brace import
* fix type exports
* update expressions_explorer requiredBundles
* remove make_id mocks
* snapshot updates
* fix import 🤦
* Fix `ReferenceError: ace is not defined` Jest failures
* Remove unused brace import (?)
- Assuming here, as no code editor is actually being used in this file
* Fix failing Jest test due to EuiCodeEditor moving to es_ui_shared plugin
+ minor cleanup of `jest.mock()`s
* Fix failing Jest test due to snapshot update
* Fix failing `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'euiBorderRadius')` Jest test
- since this is being mount()'d, EuiThemeProvider as a wrapper is needed to prevent the failure
* access uiSettings
* Move react-ace dependency into kbn-ui-shared-deps-npm
* Revert App Search shenanigans
- caused local unsaved changes shenanigans, somehow
* secondary -> success
Co-authored-by: Constance Chen <constance.chen.3@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chandler Prall <chandler.prall@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Constance Chen <constance.chen@elastic.co>
