mirror of
https://github.com/elastic/kibana.git
synced 2025-04-23 17:28:26 -04:00
### Summary - Closes #89741 This PR contains the resulting work of a massive effort that ports our on top bundler abstraction (called @kbn/optimizer) from Webpack v4 into Webpack v5. It's essential in terms of long term maintenance since v4 was not receiving updates any longer but will also unblock some new features that could be beneficial for our future DevEx endeavours. Next you can find a small list of all the accomplished tasks on this journey. ### Completed Tasks - [x] Upgrade dependencies to match the ones on webpack v5 - [x] Fix null-loader usages - [x] Fix raw-loader usages - [x] Fix file-loader usages - [x] Fix url-loader usages - [x] Fix `@kbn/optimizer-webpack-helpers` to support webpack v5 - [x] Adopt previous webpack v4 polyfill-all strategy with node-polyfill-webpack-plugin - [x] Fix theme-loader on @kbn/optimizer - [x] Migrate configurations and ad-hoc loader options on all webpack configs from v4 to v5 - [x] Fix @kbn/test jest resolver for file-loader cases - [x] Migrate public-path loader on UiSharedDeps - [x] Fix all usages of webpack-merge - [x] Migrate BundleRemoteModule - [x] Migrate BundleRemotesPlugin - [x] Correctly migrate PopulateBundleCachePlugin - [x] Correctly migrate BundleMetricsPlugin - [x] Check if the profiling plugins still work (--profile flag) - [x] Recover if possible the previous webpack v4 cacheGroup chunks rename to something like `data.plugin.chunk.0.js` - [x] Run `/ci` and make sure we get our first green CI, otherwise work on the errors until we do - [x] Profile and solve bottlenecks until we get a cold build performance similar to the one we had on webpack v4 (`node scripts/build_kibana_platform_plugins --no-cache`). - [x] OpenSSL Legacy Warnings: try to remove `--openssl-legacy-provider ` flags - [x] Add Webpack to Renovate config - [x] Explore removing `NodePolyfillPlugin` ([here](https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-polyfill-webpack-plugin)) and add each polyfill needed individually per each webpack config to check if we get smaller bundles. If we do it's better to go with the case by case need approach instead of deploying a bunch of polyfills with NodePolyfillPlugin. As another alternative, create a custom smaller plugin with only the union of all needed polyfills. - [x] Evaluate if we want to touch the resolutions on mainFields and conditionNames - [x] Understand why `@import 'src/core/public/mixins'` does not work anymore (not a problem, we should use relative paths anyway but we want to track why it changed from v4 to v5) - [x] BUG: Child compilers are having errors hidden and/or changed from error to warning - [x] Fix license check for [Artistic-2.0](https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0.html) is the license for [domain-browser](https://github.com/bevry/domain-browser?tab=License-1-ov-file). This package is a dependency of [NodePolyfillPlugin](https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-polyfill-webpack-plugin). Artistic 2.0 license is [classified as yellow](https://github.com/elastic/open-source/blob/main/elastic-product-policy.md#yellow-list) and should only be used for dev dependencies. - [x] Make sure `resourceQuery: { not: /raw/ }` is not necessary on other webpack configs like storybook one - [x] Find what is being wrongly removed by usedExports optimization; hint: I believe it is identifying a lot of exports inside the sync entry of plugins as unused exports and removing them. Then `__kbnBootstrap__` can't be found - [x] Rebalance @kbn/optimizer pickMaxWorkerCount - [x] Re-open the issue to fix sass-warnings [#190345](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/190345) or downgrade sass-loader to v10 - [x] Remove previous esm no parse rules - [x] Confirm esm support is working - [x] Confirm console override is needed - [x] Confirm react prod builds on ui shared deps for distributable - [x] Remove customization for [xyflow](https://github.com/xyflow/xyflow) from webpack configs - [x] Clean all the code - [x] Make sure collected metrics from stats are still aligned with what we were collecting before; also verify if the modules used for optimizer caches etc are well generated (@kbn/node-libs-browser) - [x] Fix watch performance --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Brad White <brad.white@elastic.co> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
jest_integration | ||
jest_integration_node | ||
jest_node | ||
src | ||
types/ftr_globals | ||
index.ts | ||
jest-preset.js | ||
jest.config.js | ||
jest.integration.config.js | ||
kbn_test_config.ts | ||
kibana.jsonc | ||
package.json | ||
README.mdx | ||
tsconfig.json |
--- id: kibDevDocsOpsTest slug: /kibana-dev-docs/ops/test title: '@kbn/test' description: A package provide ways to run tests date: 2022-08-15 tags: ['kibana', 'dev', 'contributor', 'operations', 'cli', 'dev', 'mode', 'test'] --- # Kibana Testing Library The @kbn/test package provides ways to run tests. Currently only functional testing is provided by this library, with unit and other testing possibly added here. ## Functional Testing ### Dependencies Functional testing methods exist in the `src/functional_tests` directory. They depend on the Functional Test Runner, which is found in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src/functional_test_runner`](../../src/functional_test_runner). Ideally libraries provided by kibana packages such as this one should not depend on kibana source code that lives in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src`](../../src). The goal is to start pulling test and development utilities out into packages so they can be used across Kibana and plugins. Accordingly the Functional Test Runner itself will be pulled out into a package (or part of a package), and this package's dependence on it will not be an issue. ### Exposed methods #### `runTests(configPaths: Array<string>)` For each config file specified in configPaths, starts Elasticsearch and Kibana once, runs tests specified in that config file, and shuts down Elasticsearch and Kibana once completed. (Repeats for every config file.) `configPaths`: array of strings, each an absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js). Internally the method that starts Elasticsearch comes from [kbn-es](../../packages/kbn-es). #### `startServers(configPath: string)` Starts Elasticsearch and Kibana servers given a specified config. `configPath`: absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js). Allows users to start another process to run just the tests while keeping the servers running with this method. Start servers _and_ run tests using the same config file ([see how](../../scripts/README.md)). ## Rationale ### Single config per setup We think it makes sense to specify the tests to run along with the particular server configuration for Elasticsearch and Kibana servers, because the tests expect a particular configuration. For example, saml api integration tests expect certain xml files to exist in Elasticsearch's config directory, and certain saml specific options to be passed in via the command line (or alternatively via the `.yml` config file) to both Elasticsearch and Kibana. It makes sense to keep all these config options together with the list of test files. ### Multiple configs running in succession We also think it makes sense to have a test runner intelligently (but simply) start servers, run tests, tear down servers, and repeat for each config, uninterrupted. There's nothing special about each kind of config that specifies running some set of functional tests against some kind of Elasticsearch/Kibana servers. There doesn't need to be a separate job to run each kind of setup/test/teardown. These can all be orchestrated sequentially via the current `runTests` implementation. This is how we envision tests to run on CI. This inherently means that grouping test files in configs matters, such that a group of test files that depends on a particular server config appears together in that config's `testFiles` list. Given how quickly and easily we can start servers using [@kbn/es](../../packages/kbn-es), it should not impact performance to logically group tests by domain even if multiple groups of tests share the same server config. We can think about how to group test files together across domains when that time comes.