Version 5.2.7 include this commit
https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=commit;h=31d80c6b261b24220776dfaeb8a04f80f80e0a24
With this change, compiling libzim mixed (libzim dynamic and dependencies,
so lzma, statically) fails at libzim linking with a
`src/libzim.so.8.0.1: version node not found for symbol lzma_get_progress@XZ_5.2.2`
error message.
This can be "workaround" by passing `--disable-symbol-versions` to
configure script but then, it is the compilation of kiwix-desktop in
native_dyn which falling with
```
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libsystemd.so.0: undefined reference to `lzma_code@XZ_5.0'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libsystemd.so.0: undefined reference to `lzma_end@XZ_5.0'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libsystemd.so.0: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_decoder@XZ_5.0'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2: undefined reference to `lzma_auto_decoder@XZ_5.0'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2: undefined reference to `lzma_properties_decode@XZ_5.0'
```
Probably because some native dependencies (Qt ?) use versionned symbols.
This have to be fixed somehow but until then, let's go back to 5.2.6
`icu4c_wasm.patch` is build by :
- Copying config.sub from liblzma source as new version of config.sub there
knows about wasm architecture.
- Copying `mh-linux` on `mh-unknown` as specified in (origin) `mh-unknown`.
This is because icu4c configure doesn't detect `emscripten` platform and
"fallback" to `mh-unknown`.
By uploading read-only archive, we prevent potential (implicit) re-upload.
A re-upload will always be possible if we remove the archive and rerun
the workflow. But it will be clearly explicit in this case.
While it is ok to build all libkiwix android builds in one step,
the "release system" upload only one archive per platform.
So we need 4 platforms to do 4 uploads.
As we don't build on "android" platform now, we can clean up our scripts.
When build_release_nightly calls codesign to sign libzim.7.dylib, it appears to be
hanging forever.
What's most likely happening is that Keychain Access is prompting a password request
without any possibility to answer, given this is running on the CI.
It's unclear whether Keychain Access wants to confirm codesign can access the certificate
or if it is trying to unlock another (System) keychain to find the certificate or key.
This addresses the former.
