elasticsearch/docs/reference/elasticsearch-plugins/mapper-annotated-text-highlighter.md
Colleen McGinnis b7e3a1e14b
[docs] Migrate docs from AsciiDoc to Markdown (#123507)
* delete asciidoc files

* add migrated files

* fix errors

* Disable docs tests

* Clarify release notes page titles

* Revert "Clarify release notes page titles"

This reverts commit 8be688648d.

* Comment out edternal URI images

* Clean up query languages landing pages, link to conceptual docs

* Add .md to url

* Fixes inference processor nesting.

---------

Co-authored-by: Liam Thompson <32779855+leemthompo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Thompson <leemthompo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martijn Laarman <Mpdreamz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: István Zoltán Szabó <szabosteve@gmail.com>
2025-02-27 17:56:14 +01:00

48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown

---
mapped_pages:
- https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/plugins/current/mapper-annotated-text-highlighter.html
---
# Using the annotated highlighter [mapper-annotated-text-highlighter]
The `annotated-text` plugin includes a custom highlighter designed to mark up search hits in a way which is respectful of the original markup:
```console
# Example documents
PUT my-index-000001/_doc/1
{
"my_field": "The cat sat on the [mat](sku3578)"
}
GET my-index-000001/_search
{
"query": {
"query_string": {
"query": "cats"
}
},
"highlight": {
"fields": {
"my_field": {
"type": "annotated", <1>
"require_field_match": false
}
}
}
}
```
1. The `annotated` highlighter type is designed for use with annotated_text fields
The annotated highlighter is based on the `unified` highlighter and supports the same settings but does not use the `pre_tags` or `post_tags` parameters. Rather than using html-like markup such as `<em>cat</em>` the annotated highlighter uses the same markdown-like syntax used for annotations and injects a key=value annotation where `_hit_term` is the key and the matched search term is the value e.g.
```
The [cat](_hit_term=cat) sat on the [mat](sku3578)
```
The annotated highlighter tries to be respectful of any existing markup in the original text:
* If the search term matches exactly the location of an existing annotation then the `_hit_term` key is merged into the url-like syntax used in the `(...)` part of the existing annotation.
* However, if the search term overlaps the span of an existing annotation it would break the markup formatting so the original annotation is removed in favour of a new annotation with just the search hit information in the results.
* Any non-overlapping annotations in the original text are preserved in highlighter selections