kibana/packages/kbn-test
Khristinin Nikita 2bd52fc421
Risk engine initialisation, update from legacy risk engine workflow and status change (#162400)
## Risk engine initialisation, update from legacy risk engine workflow
and status change



dfb75d4a-f447-4346-9760-d0e9685cce39


Green areas it is what was implemented
<img width="1449" alt="Screenshot 2023-08-01 at 15 07 01"
src="4d87887f-1163-45eb-a4e9-a77a685f6565">


This pr has:
- Upgrade workflow. If the user has a risk host or user transforms, we
will show the panel with a call to action for the upgrade.
- Introduce new Saved object to save the configuration of risk engine
- API which is described bellow

It required experiment enabled - **riskScoringRoutesEnabled**
## New API

### /engine/status

#### GET
Get the status of the Risk Engine

##### Description:
Returns the status of both the legacy transform-based risk engine, as
well as the new risk engine

##### Responses

```json
{
  "legacy_risk_engine_status": "NOT_INSTALLED" , "ENABLED"
  ,
  "risk_engine_status": "NOT_INSTALLED" , "ENABLED" , "DISABLED"
}
```

### /engine/init

#### POST
Initialize the Risk Engine

##### Description:
Initializes the Risk Engine by creating the necessary indices and
mappings, removing old transforms, creating saved object configuration

##### Responses

```json
{
  "result": {
    "risk_engine_enabled": true,
    "risk_engine_resources_installed": true,
    "risk_engine_configuration_created": true,
    "legacy_risk_engine_disabled": true,
    "errors": [
      "string"
    ]
  }
}
```

### /engine/enable

#### POST
Enable the Risk Engine
##### Description:
Change saved object configuration and in the future here we will start
task

### /engine/disable

#### POST
Disable the Risk Engine
Change saved object configuration and in the future here we will stop
task

---------

Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryland Herrick <ryalnd@gmail.com>
2023-08-04 09:03:46 -07:00
..
jest_integration Transpile packages on demand, validate all TS projects (#146212) 2022-12-22 19:00:29 -06:00
jest_integration_node Transpile packages on demand, validate all TS projects (#146212) 2022-12-22 19:00:29 -06:00
jest_node Transpile packages on demand, validate all TS projects (#146212) 2022-12-22 19:00:29 -06:00
src Risk engine initialisation, update from legacy risk engine workflow and status change (#162400) 2023-08-04 09:03:46 -07:00
types/ftr_globals [eslint] add rule for auto-fixing unused imports (#131772) 2022-05-11 11:16:48 -05:00
index.ts [Security Solution] ~200 ways to decrease flakiness in Cypress (#157387) 2023-05-30 17:40:18 +02:00
jest-preset.js [context] Unify Contexts, deprecate others (#161914) 2023-07-28 09:30:08 -07:00
jest.config.js [jest] add *_node presets (#126192) 2022-02-23 09:36:30 -06:00
jest.integration.config.js [jest] add *_node presets (#126192) 2022-02-23 09:36:30 -06:00
kbn_test_config.ts [packages] migrate all plugins to packages (#148130) 2023-02-08 21:06:50 -06:00
kibana.jsonc [codeowners] add appex-qa for ftr-related packages (#155230) 2023-05-24 08:53:09 +02:00
package.json Transpile packages on demand, validate all TS projects (#146212) 2022-12-22 19:00:29 -06:00
README.mdx [docs] Fix kbn-test README issue breaking docs (#138940) 2022-08-17 02:11:20 +09:30
tsconfig.json [FTR] KbnClientSavedObjects improvements (#149582) 2023-01-30 09:05:53 -07:00

---
id: kibDevDocsOpsTest
slug: /kibana-dev-docs/ops/test
title: '@kbn/test'
description: A package provide ways to run tests
date: 2022-08-15
tags: ['kibana', 'dev', 'contributor', 'operations', 'cli', 'dev', 'mode', 'test']
---

# Kibana Testing Library

The @kbn/test package provides ways to run tests. Currently only functional testing is provided by this library, with unit and other testing possibly added here.

## Functional Testing

### Dependencies

Functional testing methods exist in the `src/functional_tests` directory. They depend on the Functional Test Runner, which is found in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src/functional_test_runner`](../../src/functional_test_runner). Ideally libraries provided by kibana packages such as this one should not depend on kibana source code that lives in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src`](../../src). The goal is to start pulling test and development utilities out into packages so they can be used across Kibana and plugins. Accordingly the Functional Test Runner itself will be pulled out into a package (or part of a package), and this package's dependence on it will not be an issue.

### Exposed methods

#### `runTests(configPaths: Array<string>)`

For each config file specified in configPaths, starts Elasticsearch and Kibana once, runs tests specified in that config file, and shuts down Elasticsearch and Kibana once completed. (Repeats for every config file.)

`configPaths`: array of strings, each an absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js).

Internally the method that starts Elasticsearch comes from [kbn-es](../../packages/kbn-es).

#### `startServers(configPath: string)`

Starts Elasticsearch and Kibana servers given a specified config.

`configPath`: absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js).

Allows users to start another process to run just the tests while keeping the servers running with this method. Start servers _and_ run tests using the same config file ([see how](../../scripts/README.md)).

## Rationale

### Single config per setup

We think it makes sense to specify the tests to run along with the particular server configuration for Elasticsearch and Kibana servers, because the tests expect a particular configuration. For example, saml api integration tests expect certain xml files to exist in Elasticsearch's config directory, and certain saml specific options to be passed in via the command line (or alternatively via the `.yml` config file) to both Elasticsearch and Kibana. It makes sense to keep all these config options together with the list of test files.

### Multiple configs running in succession

We also think it makes sense to have a test runner intelligently (but simply) start servers, run tests, tear down servers, and repeat for each config, uninterrupted. There's nothing special about each kind of config that specifies running some set of functional tests against some kind of Elasticsearch/Kibana servers. There doesn't need to be a separate job to run each kind of setup/test/teardown. These can all be orchestrated sequentially via the current `runTests` implementation. This is how we envision tests to run on CI.

This inherently means that grouping test files in configs matters, such that a group of test files that depends on a particular server config appears together in that config's `testFiles` list. Given how quickly and easily we can start servers using [@kbn/es](../../packages/kbn-es), it should not impact performance to logically group tests by domain even if multiple groups of tests share the same server config. We can think about how to group test files together across domains when that time comes.