mirror of
https://github.com/elastic/kibana.git
synced 2025-06-27 18:51:07 -04:00
## Summary Prepares the serverless FTR tests to be runnable with a custom ES image. (`--esServerlessImage` cli arg) Creates a pipeline for testing and promoting ES Serverless docker releases. The job can be triggered here: https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-elasticsearch-serverless-verify-and-promote The three main env variables it takes: - BUILDKITE_BRANCH: the kibana branch to test with (maybe not as important) - BUILDKITE_COMMIT: the kibana commit to test with - ES_SERVERLESS_IMAGE: the elasticsearch serverless image, or tag to use from this repo: `docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch-ci/elasticsearch-serverless` ## TODOS: - [x] set `latest_verified` with full img path as default - [x] ~~find other CLIs that might need the `esServerlessImage` argument (if the docker runner has multiple usages)~~ | I confused the `yarn es docker` with this, because I thought we only run ES serverless in a docker container, but `elasticsearch` can also be run in docker. - [x] set `latest-compatible` or similar flag in a manifest in gcs for Elastic's use-case - [ ] ensure we can only verify "forward" (ie.: to avoid a parameterization on old versions to set our pointers back) [on a second thought, this might be kept as a feature to roll back (if we should ever need that)] There are two confusing things I couldn't sort out just yet: #### Ambiguity in --esServerlessImage We can either have 2 CLI args: one for an image tag, one for an image repo/image url, or we can have one (like I have it now) and interpret that in the code, it can be either the image url, or the tag. It's more flexible, but it's two things in one. Is it ok this way, or is it too confusing? e.g.: ``` node scripts/functional_tests --esFrom serverless --esServerlessImage docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch-ci/elasticsearch-serverless:git-8fc8f941bd4d --bail --config x-pack/test_serverless/functional/test_suites/security/config.ts # or node scripts/functional_tests --esFrom serverless --esServerlessImage latest --bail --config x-pack/test_serverless/functional/test_suites/security/config.ts ``` #### Ambiguity in the default image path The published ES Serverless images will sit on this image path: `docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch-ci/elasticsearch-serverless`, however, our one exception is the `latest-verified` which we will be tagging under a different path, where we have write rights: `docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/elasticsearch-serverless:latest-verified`. Is it okay, that by default, we're searching in the `elasticsearch-ci` images for any tags as parameters (after all, all the new images will be published there), however our grand default will ultimately be `docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/elasticsearch-serverless:latest-verified`. ## Links Buildkite: https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-elasticsearch-serverless-verify-and-promote eg.: https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-elasticsearch-serverless-verify-and-promote/builds/24 Closes: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/162931 --------- Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
jest_integration | ||
jest_integration_node | ||
jest_node | ||
src | ||
types/ftr_globals | ||
index.ts | ||
jest-preset.js | ||
jest.config.js | ||
jest.integration.config.js | ||
kbn_test_config.ts | ||
kibana.jsonc | ||
package.json | ||
README.mdx | ||
tsconfig.json |
--- id: kibDevDocsOpsTest slug: /kibana-dev-docs/ops/test title: '@kbn/test' description: A package provide ways to run tests date: 2022-08-15 tags: ['kibana', 'dev', 'contributor', 'operations', 'cli', 'dev', 'mode', 'test'] --- # Kibana Testing Library The @kbn/test package provides ways to run tests. Currently only functional testing is provided by this library, with unit and other testing possibly added here. ## Functional Testing ### Dependencies Functional testing methods exist in the `src/functional_tests` directory. They depend on the Functional Test Runner, which is found in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src/functional_test_runner`](../../src/functional_test_runner). Ideally libraries provided by kibana packages such as this one should not depend on kibana source code that lives in [`{KIBANA_ROOT}/src`](../../src). The goal is to start pulling test and development utilities out into packages so they can be used across Kibana and plugins. Accordingly the Functional Test Runner itself will be pulled out into a package (or part of a package), and this package's dependence on it will not be an issue. ### Exposed methods #### `runTests(configPaths: Array<string>)` For each config file specified in configPaths, starts Elasticsearch and Kibana once, runs tests specified in that config file, and shuts down Elasticsearch and Kibana once completed. (Repeats for every config file.) `configPaths`: array of strings, each an absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js). Internally the method that starts Elasticsearch comes from [kbn-es](../../packages/kbn-es). #### `startServers(configPath: string)` Starts Elasticsearch and Kibana servers given a specified config. `configPath`: absolute path to a config file that looks like [this](../../test/functional/config.base.js), following the config schema specified [here](../../src/functional_test_runner/lib/config/schema.js). Allows users to start another process to run just the tests while keeping the servers running with this method. Start servers _and_ run tests using the same config file ([see how](../../scripts/README.md)). ## Rationale ### Single config per setup We think it makes sense to specify the tests to run along with the particular server configuration for Elasticsearch and Kibana servers, because the tests expect a particular configuration. For example, saml api integration tests expect certain xml files to exist in Elasticsearch's config directory, and certain saml specific options to be passed in via the command line (or alternatively via the `.yml` config file) to both Elasticsearch and Kibana. It makes sense to keep all these config options together with the list of test files. ### Multiple configs running in succession We also think it makes sense to have a test runner intelligently (but simply) start servers, run tests, tear down servers, and repeat for each config, uninterrupted. There's nothing special about each kind of config that specifies running some set of functional tests against some kind of Elasticsearch/Kibana servers. There doesn't need to be a separate job to run each kind of setup/test/teardown. These can all be orchestrated sequentially via the current `runTests` implementation. This is how we envision tests to run on CI. This inherently means that grouping test files in configs matters, such that a group of test files that depends on a particular server config appears together in that config's `testFiles` list. Given how quickly and easily we can start servers using [@kbn/es](../../packages/kbn-es), it should not impact performance to logically group tests by domain even if multiple groups of tests share the same server config. We can think about how to group test files together across domains when that time comes.